Back

Microbubble Track-based Functional Ultrasound Localization Microscopy in Awake Mice

Wang, Y.; Lowerison, M. R.; Huang, Z.; Shin, Y.; Lin, B.-Z.; Song, P.

2025-08-22 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.08.18.670859 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional neuroimaging with ultrafast ultrasound is an emerging neuroimaging tool for studying neural activities in the rodent brain. Existing methods, however, are challenged by the compromise between functional imaging sensitivity (i.e., sensitivity in detecting neural responses) and spatial resolution. For example, functional ultrasound (fUS) uses native red blood cells (RBCs) as imaging targets, which offers high functional imaging sensitivity but limited spatial resolution that is confined by the diffraction limit of ultrasound. On the other hand, functional ultrasound localization microscopy (fULM) employs intravenously injected microbubble (MB) as contrast agent to achieve super-resolved spatial resolution but at the cost of functional imaging sensitivity. This study aims to address this challenge by developing a novel, MB track-based hemodynamic activity estimation method to enhance the functional imaging sensitivity of fULM. Our approach involves conducting functional correlation analysis using the MB signals acquired from the entire MB movement track rather than individual MB centroid locations, which overcomes the signal sparsity issue in fULM. To further boost the functional sensitivity of fULM, we developed a novel approach based on indwelling jugular vein catheters to achieve fULM imaging in awake mice. The in vivo imaging results demonstrate that the proposed techniques successfully enhanced the functional imaging sensitivity of fULM without compromising its high spatial resolution. In the whisker stimulation experiments, the proposed technique enabled detection of significantly activated brain regions within fewer than five stimulation cycles (5 minutes of acquisition), reducing the required time by over 50% compared to conventional fULM.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.1%
4
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
13
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%