Phenotypic plasticity of invasive knotweed across Europe: a distributed common garden experiment
Irimia, R. E.; Parepa, M.; Sebesta, N.; Barni, E.; Giaccone, E.; Guo, Y.; Karrenberg, S.; Richards, C.; Bossdorf, O.
Show abstract
O_LIBiological invasions expose populations of introduced species to strong selection forces in abiotic and biotic factors, which is expected to lead to adaptive differentiation of populations, particularly for large-scale invaders. C_LIO_LITo better understand population differentiation and phenotypic plasticity of invasive Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica) in Europe, we compared the performance of 45 European knotweed populations, collected across a 2000 km latitudinal transect, in three common gardens with contrasting climatic conditions, one at the southern edge, one in the center, and one at the northern edge of the species European distribution. C_LIO_LIThe plants exhibited strong phenotypic plasticity across the three gardens, with a more acquisitive growth strategy in the southern garden, and a more conservative strategy and change of architecture in the climatically unfavorable north. Although we observed phenotypic selection on several leaf traits, and on the plasticity of leaf thickness, with some selection differences between the gardens, there was little evidence of population differentiation, and none for local adaptation. Only for plant architecture (shrubbiness), we detected heritable population variation in trait means and plasticity. However, variation in plasticity was unrelated to climatic variability of origin, and to plant fitness. C_LIO_LISynthesis. Our results suggest that evolutionary processes - local adaptation and evolution of plasticity - did not play a key role in the success of Japanese knotweed in Europe. Instead, its high baseline plasticity appears to be the key factor that makes it such a strong invader across a broad range of environments. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid local adaptation in both sexual and asexual invasive populations of monkeyflowers (Mimulus spp.) 97%
- Chasing the fitness optimum: temporal variation in the genetic and environmental expression of life-history traits for a perennial plant 95%
- Leaf anatomy is not correlated to CAM function in a C3+CAM hybrid species, Yucca gloriosa 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- General purpose genotypes and evolution of higher plasticity in clonality underlie knotweed invasion 97%
- A polygenic architecture with conditionally neutral effects underlies ecological differentiation in Silene 95%
- Belowground competition favors character convergence but not character displacement in root traits 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the links between pollinators and the genetic and epigenetic features of plant species with contrasting distribution ranges 95%
- The impact of microclimate and soil on the ecology and evolution of an arctic plant 93%
- Linking microenvironment modification to species interactions and demography in an alpine plant community 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct and indirect fitness effects of plant metabolites and genetic constraints limit evolution of allelopathy in an invading plant 97%
- Adaptations and responses of the common dandelion to low atmospheric pressure in high altitude environments 95%
- Functional traits and soil water availability shape competitive interactions in a diploid-polyploid complex 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary divergence of potential drought adaptations between two subspecies of an annual plant: Do some constraints need to be broken? 96%
- Environmental contributions to the evolution of trait differences in Geum triflorum: implications for restoration 95%
- Quantitative trait locus mapping reveals an independent genetic basis for joint divergence in leaf function, life-history, and floral traits between scarlet monkeyflower (Mimulus cardinalis) populations 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.