Impact of Informal Caregiving on Health Outcomes: A Population-Based Analysis Using BRFSS Data (2015 to 2020)
Bouras, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundInformal caregivers provide essential care to family members and friends with health problems or disabilities, yet little is known about the population-level health impacts of caregiving responsibilities. ObjectiveTo examine the association between informal caregiver status and physical and mental health outcomes using nationally representative data. MethodsI analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2015-2020, focusing on respondents with caregiver status information (n=422,495). Care-givers were defined as individuals providing regular care or assistance to a family member or friend with a health problem or disability. Primary outcomes were poor physical health days ([≥]14 days in past month) and poor mental health days ([≥]14 days in past month). I used survey-weighted logistic regression accounting for the complex sampling design. ResultsAmong 422,495 respondents, 89,814 (21.3%) were caregivers. Caregivers were more likely to be female (58.4% vs 50.6%) and report poor health outcomes. After accounting for survey weights, caregivers had significantly higher odds of poor physical health (OR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.23-1.34, p<0.001) and poor mental health (OR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.63-1.77, p<0.001) compared to non-caregivers. Mental health disparities were particularly pronounced, with 16.5% of caregivers vs 10.4% of non-caregivers reporting[≥] 14 poor mental health days. ConclusionsInformal caregivers experience significant health disparities compared to non-caregivers, particularly for mental health outcomes. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and policies to support caregiver health and wellbeing.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of dyadic interventions in improving outcomes for adults with multiple long-term conditions and/or frailty and their informal carers: A systematic review protocol 93%
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 93%
- Determinants of self-reported health status during COVID-19 lockdown among surveyed Ecuadorian population: a cross sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 93%
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 93%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative Social Disadvantage and Health-Related Quality of Life: National Health Interview Survey 2013-2017 93%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 91%
- Disparities in COVID-19 Hospitalizations and Mortality among Black and Hispanic Patients: Cross-Sectional Analysis from the Greater Houston Metropolitan Area 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Life Expectancy and Voting Patterns in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election 90%
- County-Level Estimates of Excess Mortality associated with COVID-19 in the United States 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression at the intersection of race/ethnicity, sex/gender, and sexual orientation in a nationally representative sample of US adults: A design-weighted MAIHDA 91%
- Lifecourse Socioeconomic Status and Cognitive Performance Among Midlife Latina Women in a California Agricultural Region 90%
- Missing data and missed infections: Investigating racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 testing and infection rates in Holyoke, Massachusetts 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.