Back

Phenological characterization of Mozambican native caprine breeds assessed through morpho-biometric traits and zoometric indices

Culhe, D.; Matola, M.; Muatareque, E.; Morrombe, M.; Manhique, M. P.; Tseu, R.; Changule, A. P.; Taela, M.; Bila, C.; Garcia-Herreros, M.

2025-08-20 physiology
10.1101/2025.08.15.670476 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study aimed to characterize the morpho-structural traits of indigenous goats reared at the Chobela Research Station in the Magude District of southern Mozambique. A total of 135 goats were randomly selected, comprising 77 Landim and 60 Pafuri animals. Racial characteristics were assessed through visual inspection, while morphometric traits were measured using a zoometric tape. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests were performed at a 5% significance level using SPSS version 27. In terms of racial traits, all Pafuri goats exhibited a convex facial profile, whereas Landim goats showed both convex (57.9%) and concave (42.1%) profiles. Approximately 75% of the goats presented a uniform coat colour. Morphometric comparisons revealed that Landim goats had higher average values for horn length (mean difference, MD: 0.21 cm), withers height (MD: 0.14 cm), and body length (MD: 0.24 cm). In contrast, Pafuri goats had greater head length (MD: 0.18 cm), head width (MD: 0.11 cm), ear length (MD: 0.09 cm), and thoracic perimeter (MD: 0.26 cm). Regarding zoometric indices, Landim goats recorded higher body (1.71), cephalic (0.31), and thoracic (1.31) index values, while Pafuri goats exhibited a slightly higher proportionality index (0.40). The morpho-structural differences identified between Landim and Pafuri goats demonstrate distinct phenotypic profiles that can support breed characterization. These results provide a valuable baseline for future genetic studies and contribute to conservation and sustainable utilization strategies for indigenous goat populations in Mozambique.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.