Back

Symbolic Regression for Mycophenolic Acid Dosage Prediction in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Senivarapu, S.; Ananthanarayanan, A.; Murari, A.; Hu, B. Z.; Sha, A. Z.

2025-08-19 nephrology
10.1101/2025.08.15.25333810 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) affects millions worldwide and often progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), for which kidney transplantation remains the standard-of-care. Achieving optimal post-transplant immunosuppression-in particular, precise mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing--is critical for long-term graft survival. However, in practice, dose personalization remains difficult, especially in underserved and rural populations where access to transplant pharmacology expertise is limited. MethodsWe developed an interpretable symbolic regression model trained on retrospective, multi-center kidney transplant datasets. Input variables included patient demographics, anthropometrics, initial MPA loading dose, primary immunosuppressant, and induction therapy regimen. For benchmarking, we also evaluated a suite of state-of-the-art machine learning models, including random forests and gradient-boosted trees. ResultsThe symbolic regression model identified clinically intuitive patterns: taller patients with lower initial MPA doses often require higher maintenance dosing; overly high starting doses are penalized; and dosing adjustments are strongly influenced by induction regimen parameters. While slightly less accurate than the best-performing black-box models with a mean-absolute error of 320 mg in dosage, the symbolic model maintains clinically acceptable error levels and offers full transparency of decision logic. ConclusionsOur explainable machine learning model delivers transparent, patient-specific MPA dosing recommendations that maintain clinically acceptable accuracy while revealing the underlying decision logic. By bridging the gap between complex pharmacologic modeling and point-of-care accessibility, this approach offers a viable pathway to improve post-transplant immunosuppression in settings where specialist support is scarce.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
3
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
7
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
15
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%