Symbolic Regression for Mycophenolic Acid Dosage Prediction in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Senivarapu, S.; Ananthanarayanan, A.; Murari, A.; Hu, B. Z.; Sha, A. Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) affects millions worldwide and often progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), for which kidney transplantation remains the standard-of-care. Achieving optimal post-transplant immunosuppression-in particular, precise mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing--is critical for long-term graft survival. However, in practice, dose personalization remains difficult, especially in underserved and rural populations where access to transplant pharmacology expertise is limited. MethodsWe developed an interpretable symbolic regression model trained on retrospective, multi-center kidney transplant datasets. Input variables included patient demographics, anthropometrics, initial MPA loading dose, primary immunosuppressant, and induction therapy regimen. For benchmarking, we also evaluated a suite of state-of-the-art machine learning models, including random forests and gradient-boosted trees. ResultsThe symbolic regression model identified clinically intuitive patterns: taller patients with lower initial MPA doses often require higher maintenance dosing; overly high starting doses are penalized; and dosing adjustments are strongly influenced by induction regimen parameters. While slightly less accurate than the best-performing black-box models with a mean-absolute error of 320 mg in dosage, the symbolic model maintains clinically acceptable error levels and offers full transparency of decision logic. ConclusionsOur explainable machine learning model delivers transparent, patient-specific MPA dosing recommendations that maintain clinically acceptable accuracy while revealing the underlying decision logic. By bridging the gap between complex pharmacologic modeling and point-of-care accessibility, this approach offers a viable pathway to improve post-transplant immunosuppression in settings where specialist support is scarce.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced Annotation of CD45RA to Distinguish T cell Subsets in Single Cell RNA-seq via Machine Learning 92%
- Prediction of the infecting organism in peritoneal dialysis patients with acute peritonitis using interpretable Tsetlin Machines 90%
- Mining drug-target interactions from biomedical literature using chemical and gene descriptions-based ensemble transformer model. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural modeling for Oxford histological classifications of immunoglobulin A nephropathy 93%
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 92%
- Imbalanced Machine Learning Classification Models For Removal Biosimilar Drugs And Increased Activity In Patients With Rheumatic Diseases 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preprint server use in kidney disease research: a rapid review 91%
- Dasatinib nephrotoxicity correlates with patient-specific pharmacokinetics 91%
- The mediating role of trust in physicians on the association between multidimensional health literacy and medication adherence in hemodialysis: A cross-sectional study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 92%
- Machine Learning Directed Interventions Associate with Decreased Hospitalization Rates in Hemodialysis Patients 91%
- A Deep Learning Method to Detect Opioid Prescription and Opioid Use Disorder from Electronic Health Records 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.