Back

Center-surround processing in psychosis

Montoya, S. A.; Moser, H. R.; Kamath, R. S.; Chong, L. S.; Grant, A. N.; Marjanska, M.; Sponheim, S. R.; Engel, S. A.; Olman, C. A.; Schallmo, M.-P.

2025-08-19 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.08.15.25333221 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePeople with psychotic psychopathology (PwPP) often experience subtle variations in visual perception, which can be quantified experimentally. In the contrast surround suppression illusion, a central pattern appears to have lower contrast in the presence of a surrounding pattern. PwPP typically show weaker contrast suppression from the surround than controls, but the mechanisms underlying this difference are still poorly understood. MethodsWe assessed perceptual and neural surround suppression in 38 controls, 44 first-degree biological relatives of PwPP, and 64 PwPP as part of the Psychosis Human Connectome Project. To better understand neural mechanisms contributing to diminished surround suppression we quantified contrast discrimination thresholds and examined 7 tesla fMRI responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), primary visual cortex (V1), and lateral occipital complex (LOC). Additionally, we measured the concentration of {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA; an inhibitory neurotransmitter) in occipital cortex using 7 T MR spectroscopy. ResultsResponses in LOC showed the expected effect of weaker surround suppression in PwPP and relatives versus controls. However, in V1 we found no differences in surround suppression strength between controls, relatives, and PwPP. Additionally, we saw no behavioral evidence for reduced surround suppression in PwPP. Suppression metrics were not significantly correlated with occipital GABA levels or symptom measures. Multi-voxel pattern analysis of V1 fMRI responses revealed a group difference in decoding Surround vs. No Surround, with a trend toward lower accuracy in PwPP vs. controls. ConclusionOur results suggest subtle differences in visual center-surround processing among people with schizophrenia. Possible explanations for the discrepancy with previous findings include differences in task design and the deployment of spatial attention across groups. Poorer decoding of center vs. surround may suggest neural representations of spatial context in V1 are less reliable in PwPP.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.5%
2
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
11
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%