Back

Center-surround processing in psychosis

Montoya, S. A.; Moser, H. R.; Kamath, R. S.; Chong, L. S.; Grant, A. N.; Marjanska, M.; Sponheim, S. R.; Engel, S. A.; Olman, C. A.; Schallmo, M.-P.

2025-08-19 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.08.15.25333221 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePeople with psychotic psychopathology (PwPP) often experience subtle variations in visual perception, which can be quantified experimentally. In the contrast surround suppression illusion, a central pattern appears to have lower contrast in the presence of a surrounding pattern. PwPP typically show weaker contrast suppression from the surround than controls, but the mechanisms underlying this difference are still poorly understood. MethodsWe assessed perceptual and neural surround suppression in 38 controls, 44 first-degree biological relatives of PwPP, and 64 PwPP as part of the Psychosis Human Connectome Project. To better understand neural mechanisms contributing to diminished surround suppression we quantified contrast discrimination thresholds and examined 7 tesla fMRI responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), primary visual cortex (V1), and lateral occipital complex (LOC). Additionally, we measured the concentration of {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA; an inhibitory neurotransmitter) in occipital cortex using 7 T MR spectroscopy. ResultsResponses in LOC showed the expected effect of weaker surround suppression in PwPP and relatives versus controls. However, in V1 we found no differences in surround suppression strength between controls, relatives, and PwPP. Additionally, we saw no behavioral evidence for reduced surround suppression in PwPP. Suppression metrics were not significantly correlated with occipital GABA levels or symptom measures. Multi-voxel pattern analysis of V1 fMRI responses revealed a group difference in decoding Surround vs. No Surround, with a trend toward lower accuracy in PwPP vs. controls. ConclusionOur results suggest subtle differences in visual center-surround processing among people with schizophrenia. Possible explanations for the discrepancy with previous findings include differences in task design and the deployment of spatial attention across groups. Poorer decoding of center vs. surround may suggest neural representations of spatial context in V1 are less reliable in PwPP.

Published in Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.