The use of the Ages and stages questionnaire in Bradford as a measure of Child Development (ABCD): a mixed methods study protocol
Henderson, H.; Mooney, K. E.; Morton, K.; Armour, L.; Lee, D.; Ahern, S.; Blower, S. L.; Dickerson, J.
Show abstract
The Ages and Stages Questionnaire(R) is the earliest routinely recorded measure of childrens development at age two, administered in England. However, there have been few studies on the acceptability of this measure within a UK setting, especially for families at risk of inequity. To ensure all children and families receive the necessary support, a reliable measure of child development is essential. This mixed-methods study aims to address the current evidence gaps by investigating if the Ages and Stages Questionnaire(R) is acceptable, implementable, and equitable for use by health professionals and families as an overall measure of child development in a UK setting. This study will use data from Born in Bradfords Better Start birth cohort, which recruits from three ethnically diverse, socioeconomically deprived inner-city wards of the Bradford District. Rich baseline sociodemographic information will be linked to individual-level local health visiting data to describe how many children have records of an Ages and Stages Questionnaire(R), investigate the factors associated with children having a record and describe differences in questionnaire scores by sociodemographic characteristics. To support interpretation of the quantitative analyses within the local context, qualitative semi-structured interviews will be conducted to explore health professionals perspectives and experiences of implementing the Ages and Stages Questionnaire(R) in Bradford. We will analyse the interview data using descriptive thematic analysis and integrate the data using the process of triangulation. We will use the Health Equity Implementation Framework to underpin our approach. This study has been designed with the Bradford Health Visiting Service to support development of locally relevant, evidence-based recommendations for improving the implementation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire(R). The findings from this research will also provide crucial insights into the use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire(R) as a tool for measuring early child development, particularly in ethnically diverse, urban populations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: Born in Wales - a birth cohort with maternity, parental, and child data linkage for life course research in Wales, UK 96%
- The COVID in the Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study: protocol for a longitudinal study of parental mental health, social interactions, physical growth, and cognitive development of infants during the pandemic 96%
- Cohort Profile: Health and Attainment of Pupils in a Primary Education National-Cohort (HAPPEN). A hybrid total population cohort in Wales, UK 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 97%
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 97%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of violence: protocol for a three-generational longitudinal mixed-methods study in South Africa (INTERRUPT_VIOLENCE) 95%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 95%
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Nurturing Care in Nairobi Slums: Findings from 5 rounds of cross-sectional telephone surveys 95%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 95%
- A community developed conceptual model for reducing long-term health problems in children with intellectual disability in India 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.