Back

Obsessive-Compulsive Tendencies Shift the Balance Between Competitive Neurocognitive Processes

Brezoczki, B.; Vekony, T.; Farkas, B. C.; Hann, F.; Nemeth, D.

2025-08-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.13.669948 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Theoretical models of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) emphasize that symptoms may arise from an imbalance between habitual and goal-directed processes, characterized by increased reliance on habitual behavior and reduced efficiency of goal-directed control. However, it remains unclear whether similar alterations appear at a more general functional level, beyond reward-driven mechanisms. The present study, therefore, investigated the relationship between statistical learning (SL), an implicit, reward-independent mechanism that supports the detection of environmental regularities, and cognitive flexibility, defined as the capacity to adapt behavior and cognitive strategies to changing environmental demands. By adopting a dimensional approach to obsessive-compulsive (OC) tendencies in a non-clinical sample, we aimed to clarify how continuous symptom variability relates to the interaction of these neurocognitive processes. A total of 404 participants completed an online probabilistic sequence learning task assessing SL and a card-sorting task measuring cognitive flexibility. Results revealed an antagonistic relationship between SL and cognitive flexibility. Importantly, this inverse association weakened as OC tendencies increased, suggesting that OC tendencies may alter the typical balance between automatic and goal-directed functions even at undiagnosed levels. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=174 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/669948v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14be655org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ff0a67org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1041e59org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@164a21a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIOCD theories propose an imbalance between automatic and goal-directed control systems. C_LIO_LIWe tested whether this imbalance emerges at a functional level, beyond reward-based learning. C_LIO_LIStatistical learning and cognitive flexibility showed an antagonistic relationship in a non-clinical sample. C_LIO_LIThis inverse association weakened as obsessive-compulsive tendencies increased. C_LIO_LIOC tendencies alter the interaction between automatic learning and executive control even at subclinical levels. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
2
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
6
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
7
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
14
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
15
International Journal of Psychophysiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
18
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
19
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
20
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
21
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
22
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
23
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
24
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
25
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
27
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
28
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
29
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%