Back

Nuclear Irregularity as a Universal Diagnostic Tool in Solid Tumors

Hamilton, F.; Foster, K.

2025-08-15 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.12.669986 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As tumors develop, cancer cells accumulate diverse genomic and phenotypic alterations to meet heightened demands for energy production and biosynthesis. Loss of lamina function and perturbations in energy production are associated with pronounced aberrations in cellular morphology, particularly within nuclear architecture and the plasma membrane. Systematic analysis of nuclear morphology can reveal conserved structures across diverse cancer types, enabling disease state stratification, biomarker discovery, and potential avenues for personalizing therapy to minimize recurrence risk. To this end, this study analyzes an imaging mass cytometry (IMC) breast cancer dataset, differentiating cancerous and non-cancerous nuclei with a p-value of 1.02e-06. In addition, this study achieves an accuracy of 78 percent using a computational and machine learning-based pipeline for analyzing the morphological heterogeneity of nuclei and protein expression, enabling characterization of patient-specific tumor phenotypes. Unlike traditional morphology analysis pipelines limited to specific imaging platforms, this workflow enables cross-cohort and cross-cancer comparison, capturing tumor-specific phenotypic deviations at a single-cell resolution. The resulting pheno-typic profiles could inform prognosis, treatment, and monitoring of therapeutic response. SummaryAs cancers become more aggressive and require more energy, typically uniform and organized cells begin to develop abnormal features to support their heightened needs. Studies have found that the prevalence of abnormal features is directly associated with the speed at which the tumor grows, but also the bodys ability to fight back. This study aims to streamline the analysis of these irregular features across all cancer types, providing a clearer picture of how nuclei distinguish stages of cancer and aid in rapidly clinically assessing at-risk or affected patients. Using the nuclear abnormality score developed, this study was able to identify sub-populations of highly irregular cancer cells, and successfully separate them with a p-value of 1.222e-21. By comparing the expression of cancer proteins with these irregularities, we can begin to develop insights that can be used across all imaging techniques to understand the cancers inner workings and learn to predict relapse before it even occurs.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
2
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.4%
4
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
6
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
7
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
24
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%