Practical TMS coils with maximum focality and various stimulation depths
Gomez, L. J.; Koponen, L. M.; Hamdan, R.; Li, Y.; Murphy, D. L.; Goetz, s.; Peterchev, A. V.
Show abstract
Conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils generate a diffuse and shallow electric field (E-field) in the brain. This results in limited spatial targeting precision (focality). Previously, we developed a methodology for designing theoretical TMS coils to achieve optimal trade-off between the depth and focality of the induced E-field, as well as the energy required by the coil. This paper presents methods for the practical design and implementation of such focal-deep TMS (fdTMS) coils. First, we consider how the coils shape affects energy requirements and design a curved "hat" former that enables a wide range of coil placements while improving energy efficiency compared to flat formers. Second, we introduce a hybrid layer winding implementation to improve energy efficiency by using multi-layer windings in some regions of the coil and a single layer in others. Using simulations with a spherical head model, we benchmark the focality of the fdTMS E-field in the brain and the scalp, as well as the required energy, against conventional TMS coils. We then implement two fdTMS coil designs using copper wire wound inside a 3d-printed plastic former. The E-field of the prototype fdTMS coils and two conventional figure-8 counterparts is measured with a robotic probe to validate the designs. The experimental measurements corroborate the simulations, demonstrating that the fdTMS coils produce a more compact E-field relative to standard figure-8 coils. One potential disadvantage of the fdTMS coil prototypes is wider spread of the scalp E-field and increased energy loss due to the additional windings. Nonetheless, the presented fdTMS coils could offer advantages for precise mapping studies, and the design framework could be leveraged for other coil optimizations.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimized Monophasic Pulses with Equivalent Electric Field for Rapid-Rate Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 97%
- Magnetic Temporal Interference for Noninvasive Focal Brain Stimulation 96%
- Measuring Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Electric Fields in Anatomically and Conductively Accurate Rat Head Phantoms 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Powering electronic implants by high frequency volume conduction: in human validation 93%
- Magnetic Field Mapping and Correction for Moving OP-MEG 92%
- Identifiability analysis and noninvasive online estimation of the first-order neural activation dynamics in the brain with closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T - 10.5 T 96%
- Reconfigurable MRI coil technology can substantially reduce RF heating at the tips of bilateral deep brain stimulation implants 95%
- Detailed measurements and simulations of electric field distribution of two TMS coils cleared for obsessive compulsive disorder in the brain and in specific regions associated with OCD 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants in open-bore vertical MRI systems 95%
- RF shimming strategy for an open 60-channel RF transmit 7T head coil for routine use on the single transmit mode 93%
- A Numerical Alternative to MR Thermometry for Safety Validation of Multi-Channel RF Transmit Coils 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.