Back

Predicting Drug Response with Multi-Task Gradient-Boosted Trees in Epilepsy

Hellmig, J.; Bosselmann, C.; Krause, R.; May, P.; Wolking, S.; Cavalleri, G. L.; Delanty, N.; Craig, J. J.; Depondt, C.; Koeleman, B. P. C.; Marson, A. G.; O'Brien, T. J.; Sander, J. W.; Sills, G. J.; Striano, P.; Zara, F.; Stefansson, K.; Stefansson, H.; EpiPGX Consortium, ; Lerche, H.; Pfeifer, N.

2025-08-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.12.669672 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationDespite the availability of numerous anti-seizure medications (ASMs), drug resistance remains a major issue for people with epilepsy. The probability of achieving seizure freedom diminishes with each unsuccessful drug trial, and the impact of genetic and clinical markers on ASM response remains unclear. To address this issue, we used state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods to predict the response of people with epilepsy to individual ASMs based on their clinical and genomic information. ResultsTo overcome data sparsity for less common drugs, we implement a multi-task (MT) learning approach for gradient-boosted trees (GBTs), assuming that predicting responses to different ASMs involves similar tasks. This strategy allows models for less prevalent drugs to leverage the more abundant data available for other drugs during training. The proposed model outperforms individual and combined drug-response predictions for most drugs. Our findings identify key genomic and clinical features influencing drug response, enhancing understanding of individual drug responses in people with epilepsy, and aiding clinicians in making informed treatment decisions. Availability and ImplementationDue to privacy reasons data is not publically available. The code will be made available upon acceptance under https://github.com/pfeiferAI/MT-GBT

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.