Back

Outcomes of Fibrate vs Statin Therapy in Patients With Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Type 2 Diabetes

Nelson, L. M.; Maynard, J.; Morckos, M.; Petit Homme, R.; Zinabu, S.; Elkomi, R.; Michael, M.; Yousuf, S.

2025-08-14 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.08.12.25333543 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceDiabetic retinopathy (DR) progression significantly impacts vision and quality of life in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Statins and fibrates are commonly prescribed lipid-lowering medications, but their comparative effectiveness in DR progression remains uncertain. ObjectiveTo determine whether fibrates reduce the risk of DR progression compared to statins in patients with T2DM and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, a multicentered, population-based electronic medical record database. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients diagnosed with T2DM and NPDR 5-20 years prior. Patients were propensity score matched based on demographics and comorbidities. Two cohorts were defined: patients on fibrates but not statins (n = 543), and patients on statins but not fibrates (n = 60,135). After matching, each cohort included 542 patients. Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcomes: intravitreal antiVEGF injection or retinal laser procedures Secondary outcomes: progression to PDR, vitreous hemorrhage (VH), neovascularization (NV), or tractional retinal detachment (TRD) Tertiary outcomes: neovascular glaucoma (NVG) or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). ResultsFibrate-treated patients had a 57.3% risk reduction in anti-VEGF injection (RR = 0.427; 95% CI: 0.219, 0.830; p < 0.011) and longer time-to-injection (log-rank x2 = 4.927; p < 0.027). PDR risk was reduced by 59.3% (RR = 0.407; 95% CI: 0.242, 0.684; p < 0.001) with delayed progression (log-rank x2 = 8.657; p < 0.004). Fibrate use was associated with 72.1% lower instantaneous risk of NGV (HR = 0.279; 95% CI: 0.079, 0.991, p < 0.015) and delayed onset (log-rank x2 = 4.448, p < 0.036) despite a higher survival probability in the statin group (97.08% vs 96.65%). Fibrates lowered the absolute risk of NV (-0.019; 95% CI: -0.030, -0.007; p < 0.002) but increased risk of TRD (0.018; 95% CI: 0.007, 0.030; p < 0.003); however, neither occurred in the comparison group, limiting statistical power. Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients with T2DM and NPDR, fibrates were associated with reduced risk of antiVEGF injection, PDR progression, and NVG onset compared to statins. These findings suggest fibrates may help mitigate DR progression.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.8%
2
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.0%
3
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.9%
5
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
8
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
9
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
12
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
19
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Angiogenesis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
21
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
22
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%