Back

GLP-1 receptor agonist indications and prescriptions among adults who do and do not smoke

Leavens, E. L. S.; Arnold, M. J.; Nollen, N. L.; Sanderson Cox, L.; Brown, K. A.; Ellerbeck, E. F.

2025-08-17 public and global health
10.1101/2025.08.12.25331941 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSmoking and obesity are leading causes of preventable morbidity and mortality, often co-occurring and synergistically increasing risks for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are effective for managing type 2 diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease, and emerging evidence suggests potential benefit for smoking cessation. However, the prevalence of GLP-1 RA indications and prescriptions among adults who smoke is unknown. ObjectiveTo compare the frequency of GLP-1 RA indications and prescriptions among adults who do and do not smoke within a large Midwest health system. MethodsElectronic health record data identified adults ([&ge;]18 years) with outpatient primary care visits from September 2023-2024. Patients were categorized as current smokers or non-smokers. We assessed indications for GLP-1 RAs--type 2 diabetes, weight management (BMI [&ge;]30 or 27- 29.9 with comorbidity), and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and examined prescription rates among those with at least one indication. ResultsOf 59,981 patients, 4,843 (8.1%) were current smokers. Compared to non-smokers, adults who smoke were more likely to have an indication for GLP-1 RAs (66.1% vs. 62.6%; p<0.001) but less likely to receive a prescription (20.4% vs. 23.2%; p<0.001). This pattern was consistent across all indications. ConclusionAdults who smoke more frequently meet clinical criteria for GLP-1 RAs yet are less likely to be prescribed these therapies. Enhancing access to GLP-1 RAs for individuals who smoke could address critical metabolic and smoking-related health challenges, particularly given their potential role in supporting smoking cessation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.