Using deep learning methods to shorten acquisition time in children's renal cortical imaging
Gan, C.; Niu, P.; Pan, B.; Chen, X.; Xu, L.; Huang, K.; Chen, H.; Wang, Q.; Ding, L.; Yin, Y.; Wu, S.; Gong, N.-j.
Show abstract
PurposeThis study evaluates the capability of diffusion-based generative models to reconstruct diagnostic-quality renal cortical images from reduced-acquisition-time pediatric 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy. Materials and MethodsA prospective study was conducted on 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphic data from consecutive pediatric patients with suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) acquired between November 2023 and October 2024. A diffusion model SR3 was trained to reconstruct standard-quality images from simulated reduced-count data. Performance was benchmarked against U-Net, U2-Net, Restormer, and a Poisson-based variant of SR3 (PoissonSR3). Quantitative assessment employed peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), Frechet inception distance (FID), and learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS). Renal contrast and anatomic fidelity were assessed using the target-to-background ratio (TBR) and the Dice similarity coefficient respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis. ResultsThe training cohort comprised 94 participants (mean age 5.16{+/-}3.90 years; 48 male) with corresponding Poisson-downsampled images, while the test cohort included 36 patients (mean age 6.39{+/-}3.16 years; 14 male). SR3 outperformed all models, achieving the highest PSNR (30.976{+/-}2.863, P<.001), SSIM (0.760{+/-}0.064, P<.001), FID (25.687{+/-}16.223, P<.001), and LPIPS (0.055{+/-}0.022, P<.001). Further, SR3 maintained excellent renal contrast (TBR: left kidney 7.333{+/-}2.176; right kidney 7.156{+/-}1.808) and anatomical consistency (Dice coefficient: left kidney 0.749{+/-}0.200; right kidney 0.745{+/-}0.176), representing significant improvements over the fast scan (all P < .001). While Restormer, U-Net, and PoissonSR3 showed statistically significant improvements across all metrics, U2-Net exhibited limited improvement restricted to SSIM and left kidney TBR (P < .001). ConclusionSR3 enables high-quality reconstruction of 99mTc-DMSA images from 4-fold accelerated acquisitions, demonstrating potential for substantial reduction in imaging duration while preserving both diagnostic image quality and renal anatomical integrity.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 96%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 96%
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 96%
- Probabilistic Brain MR Image Transformation Using Generative Models 95%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 96%
- A metal artifact reduction method for small field of view CT imaging. 96%
- Unsupervised Neural Network-Based Image Stitching Method for Bladder Endoscopy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 94%
- A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) 93%
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.