Back

Perceived satisfaction in Fetal Therapy: Proposal and pilot of a novel assessment tool (FETAL Surgery Global Satisfaction)

Dominguez-Moreno, M.; Chimenea Toscano, A.; De Martin Hernandez, J.; Garcia Diaz, L.; Antinolo Gil, G.

2025-08-13 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.08.11.25333341 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe quality of healthcare services has garnered significant attention within the medical field, with patient-perceived satisfaction emerging as a crucial indicator. Analyzing patient satisfaction could uncover areas of weakness, suggesting the need for improvements in care. However, in the specialized field of Fetal Medicine and Therapy, there lacks a validated tool for assessing care quality from the patients perspective. This study aims to design and pilot an instrument for measuring patient-perceived satisfaction as a barometer of the quality of services provided. MethodsWe developed a survey instrument to assess six key areas of healthcare (Follow-up care, environment, transparency, accessibility of care, link between physician and patient, and global satisfaction), through 20 multiple-choice questions. It was initially piloted on a sample of 34 pregnant women undergoing a specific fetal therapy (Ex Utero Intrapartum Treatment, EXIT) at our center between June 2007 and January 2024. ResultsA total of 29 out of 34 patients agreed to participate. According to the proposed tool and the suggested scoring scale, we achieved an overall score of 4.67, indicating a very satisfactory rating. The highest mean score was for the "Global satisfaction" domain (4.76), revealing that participants where highly likely to recommend our department. It was followed by "Follow-up care" and "Environment" domains (4.69, each). Notably, "Transparency" and "Link between physician-patient" were the least rating domains (4.58 and 4.62, respectively), suggesting the timely provision of enhancement. ConclusionsWe propose "FETAL Surgery Global Satisfaction Tool" as a potential valuable instrument to assess patient-perceived satisfaction. It could provide insights into the quality of services offered by Fetal Medicine and Therapy Units. By identifying key areas for improvement, this tool could support continuous quality enhancement across Fetal Therapy programs globally. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its reliability and validity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
2
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
3
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.2%
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
15
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
20
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%