Back

Modelling radio-induced peroxidation of membrane lipids at ultrahigh dose-rate with pulsed beam

Labarbe, R.; Hotoiu, L.; Favaudon, V.

2025-08-12 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.08.669260 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Background and PurposeFLASH radiotherapy, a technique based on delivering large doses in a single fraction at the micro/millisecond timescale, spares normal tissues from late radiation-induced toxicity, in an oxygen-dependent process, whilst keeping full anti-tumor efficiency. The original model of physical-chemical mechanisms [5] underlying the FLASH effect was modified to include a two-compartment (aqueous/lipid) system to take into account key interfacial reactions, and the pulsed nature of the beam. Materials and MethodsThe model predictions were tested by showing a linear correlation between experimentally measured biological outcomes reported in the literature and the final hydroperoxyl lipid [LOOH]f predicted by the model for the different irradiation timing patterns and oxygen concentrations. ResultsThe primary, carbon-centered lipid radical [L*] fades away in less than 5 ms, reproducing the experimental observation. The model predicts a linear correlation of [LOOH]f with the inverse of the square root of the dose rate, as experimentally observed. The predicted [LOOH]f correlates with the recognition ratio of mice irradiated at different dose rates and oxygen concentrations; with zebrafish embryos mean body length for different beam timing structures; with mouse skin toxicity even with dose splitting; and with the survival of mice for different doses per pulse and average dose rates. ConclusionsThe proposed radio-kinetic model attempts to synthesize the experimental results for different beam timing patterns. It successfully shows a correlation between the predicted [LOOH]f and the experimentally observed biological outcomes following irradiation with different dose rates, beam timing structures and oxygen concentrations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.5%
2
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
11.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
6
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
11
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
14
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%