Reporting of RACE in Australian brain and mental health research: protocol for a scoping review and diversity audit
Viana, J. N.; Steward, B. A.; Ong, D. S.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in health research in multicultural societies can lead to limited understanding of health challenges and conditions that they face. This leads to interventions that may have reduced efficacy or undocumented adverse effects on certain populations. Focusing on Australian research on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, stroke, and dementia in 2020-2024, this scoping review and diversity audit aims to: 1.) evaluate reporting of variables related to RACE (race; ancestry; country of birth; country of residence and migration status; culture, including language and religion; and ethnicity) and 2.) examine representation of participants from various backgrounds. Methods and analysisThis scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Review Extension (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Six scientific and medical databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and CINAHL) were searched for relevant articles published from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2024. The search retrieved 21,927 articles, and after removing duplicates via EndNote, 10,033 articles were uploaded to Covidence for screening. All titles, abstracts, and full texts will be screened in independent duplicate. Relevant data will be extracted using a template focused on diversity and demographic-related information. Findings will be reported through narrative synthesis. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this review. Research findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication in a medical or health journal, academic and practitioner networks, and conference presentations. Strengths and limitationsO_LIThis study will be the first to simultaneously and systematically examine racial/ethnic diversity in Australian research on four brain and mental health conditions. Relevant articles will be identified using a comprehensive search strategy that aims to capture a wide range of studies. C_LIO_LIThe scoping review will employ a rigorous approach, adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines and screening all studies in independent duplicate for inter-reviewer reliability. C_LIO_LIThe synthesis is expected to identify how race, ethnicity, and related variables are reported in Australian brain and mental health research and how different minority groups are represented. Insights will inform the next phase of a research program that aims to develop pragmatic guidelines for increasing minority representation in Australian brain and mental health research. C_LIO_LIA limitation is that only articles in the past five years will be reviewed. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Athletes’ access to, attitudes towards, and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 93%
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 94%
- Suicide prevention curriculum development for health and social care students: Protocol for a scoping review 93%
- How effective are UK-based support interventions and services targeted at adults who have experienced domestic and sexual violence and abuse at improving their safety and wellbeing? A systematic review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 93%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 91%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation following self-harm: a systematic review 94%
- A thematic analysis of Prevention of Future Death Reports for Children who died by suicide in England and Wales: January 2015 to November 2023 92%
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suggestibility in functional neurological disorder: A meta-analysis 89%
- Anxiety and depression symptoms after COVID-19 infection: results from the COVID Symptom Study app 88%
- Unravelling the influence of affective stimulation on functional neurological symptoms: A pilot experiment examining potential mechanisms 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.