Rapid Access Atrial Fibrillation Clinics in Australia - Modelling outcomes and cost effectiveness
Livori, A. C.; Alex, A.; Befekadu Abebe, T.; Bell, J. S.; Ademi, Z.; Morton, J. I.
Show abstract
AimsStroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requires both estimation of risk and the initiation of anticoagulation treatment where indicated. Rapid access atrial fibrillation (RAAF) clinics are an accepted model of multidisciplinary care to reduce time at risk of stroke, but clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of them are uncertain. This study aimed to perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation of a RAAF clinic within a large regional health service in Australia. MethodsWe developed a microsimulation model using a cohort of 274 individuals referred to the RAAF clinic between 2022-2023. Clinic data was used to determine risk of stroke, major bleeding, and death from the GARFIELD equation. A comparator was designed by duplicating the cohort and changing the time from referral to consultation to a general cardiology clinic within the same health service (i.e. standard of care). The model ran in daily cycles over a two-year time horizon, with individuals replicated 1,000 times from an initial cohort of 274. The outcomes were strokes, bleeding events, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and healthcare costs for the RAAF compared to standard of care, which were used to determine incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), with 5% annual discounting ResultsThe RAAF clinic participants experienced fewer strokes (5,198 vs 5,303), bleeding events (5,369 vs 5,491) and deaths (14,158 vs 14,413). There were marginal increases in QALYs gained (1.67 vs. 1.66 QALY/person), and cost savings of $74 per person ($14,187 vs $14,261), resulting in a dominant ICER. The ICER remained dominant across one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. ConclusionRAAF clinics are likely to prevent strokes, bleeding, and are cost-saving and could lead to returns on investment. Adoption of this model of care by policy makers can ensure the delivery of safe, effective and cost-saving care that reduces stroke, bleeding, and death in people with atrial fibrillation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial Disparities and Trends in Anticoagulant Use among Ambulatory Care Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter in the United States from 2007-2019 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of intensive care for hospitalized Covid-19 patients: experience from South Africa 91%
- Cost-effectiveness of whole area testing of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in Merthyr Tydfil, 2020: A Modelling and economic analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy alone after cryptogenic stroke 94%
- The effect of coronary revascularization treatment timing on mortality in patients with stable ischemic heart disease in British Columbia 93%
- Determining Cost-Saving Risk Thresholds for Statin Use 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Outcome Disparities by Insurance Plan and Educational Attainment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation 94%
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 93%
- Aortic stenosis post-COVID-19: A mathematical model on waiting lists and mortality 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bleeding in cardiac patients prescribed antithrombotic drugs: Electronic health record phenotyping algorithms, incidence, trends and prognosis 91%
- Are Statins Optimally Prescribed to Reduce Stroke Risk in Patients with Hypercholesterolaemia? A population-based Longitudinal Study Using Electronic Health Records in South London (2005-2021) 90%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anticoagulation trends in adults aged 65 and over with atrial fibrillation; a cohort study 94%
- OpenSAFELY: impact of national guidance on switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in early phase of COVID-19 pandemic in England 93%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.