Back

Decoding Helicobacter pylori Resistance: Machine Learning Enhanced Prediction of Antibiotic Susceptibility using Whole-Genome Sequencing

Ailloud, F.; Lu, D.; Spiessberger, B.; Pamar, D.; Flossdorf, M.; Kazeroonian, A.; Oleastro, M.; Schulz, C.; Gerhard, M.; Menden, M. P.; Suerbaum, S.

2025-08-07 microbiology
10.1101/2025.08.07.669068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHelicobacter pylori is a significant risk factor for gastric cancer, peptic ulcers, and MALT lymphoma. Rising antibiotic resistance rates complicate treatment strategies. While nucleotide sequence based assays are reliable in predicting clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance, predicting metronidazole resistance is more challenging due to diverse metabolic pathways contributing to resistance, and high genomic variability. MethodsWe assembled a cohort of 483 H. pylori clinical isolates, combining whole-genome sequencing with phenotypic susceptibility testing. Machine learning models (SVM, XGBoost, FNN) were trained on genomic variants to predict resistance phenotypes. A sliding-window approach and SHAP-based importance scoring were used for feature selection to identify biologically relevant mutations, improving prediction accuracy, particularly for metronidazole resistance. ResultsThe best-performing FNN model improved metronidazole resistance prediction by 16% compared to conventional (non-ML, single polymorphisms) sequence-based detection methods applied to the same strain collection. Feature selection identified 32 feature sets, with 11 sets significantly improving F1-scores over the baseline. Combining 2-4 feature sets revealed 53 synergistic combinations across all models. Validation showed that 87% of these combinations significantly outperformed non-ML molecular testing, with 16 combinations achieving F1-scores above 0.65. ConclusionMachine-learning can significantly improve the performance of sequence-based susceptibility testing for metronidazole in H. pylori. Novel candidate predictive markers identified from whole-genome data offer testable hypotheses about yet unexplored mechanisms of metronidazole resistance. These findings support the potential for ML-based approaches to enable more accurate susceptibility-guided therapies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
3
npj Antimicrobials and Resistance
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.6%
6
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
8
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
10
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.3%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.3%
13
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%