Back

Large Language Models for Psychiatric Phenotype Extraction from Electronic Health Records

Frydman-Gani, C.; Arias, A.; Perez Vallejo, M.; Londono Martinez, J. D.; Valencia-Echeverry, J.; Castano, M.; Bui, A. A. T.; Freimer, N. B.; Lopez-Jaramillo, C.; Olde Loohuis, L. M.

2025-08-12 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.08.07.25333172 medRxiv
Show abstract

The accurate detection of clinical phenotypes from electronic health records (EHRs) is pivotal for advancing large-scale genetic and longitudinal studies in psychiatry. Free-text clinical notes are an essential source of symptom-level information, particularly in psychiatry. However, the automated extraction of symptoms from clinical text remains challenging. Here, we tested 11 open-source generative large language models (LLMs) for their ability to detect 109 psychiatric phenotypes from clinical text, using annotated EHR notes from a psychiatric clinic in Colombia. The LLMs were evaluated both "out-of-the-box" and after fine-tuning, and compared against a traditional natural language processing (tNLP) method developed from the same data. We show that while base LLM performance was poor to moderate (0.2-0.6 macro-F1 for zero-shot; 0.2-0.74 macro-F1 for few shot), it improved significantly after fine-tuning (0.75-0.86 macro-F1), with several fine-tuned LLMs outperforming the tNLP method. In total, 100 phenotypes could be reliably detected (F1>0.8) using either a fine-tuned LLM or tNLP. To generate a fine-tuned LLM that can be shared with the scientific and medical community, we created a fully synthetic dataset free of patient information but based on original annotations. We fine-tuned a top-performing LLM on this data, creating "Mistral-small-psych", an LLM that can detect psychiatric phenotypes from Spanish text with performance comparable to that of LLMs trained on real EHR data (macro-F1=0.79). Finally, the fine-tuned LLMs underwent an external validation using data from a large psychiatric hospital in Colombia, the Hospital Mental de Antioquia, highlighting that most LLMs generalized well (0.02-0.16 point loss in macro-F1). Our study underscores the value of domain-specific adaptation of LLMs and introduces a new model for accurate psychiatric phenotyping in Spanish text, paving the way for global precision psychiatry.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.