Development and validation of polygenic scores for within-family prediction of disease risks
Moore, S.; Davidson, I.; Anomaly, J.; Li, J. H.; Ahangari, M.; Moissiy, L.; Christensen, M.; Young, A. S.; Stern, D.; Wolfram, T.
Show abstract
The clinical implementation of polygenic scores (PGSs) for disease risk prediction, particularly in reproductive health applications, requires rigorous validation. Here, we develop seventeen disease PGSs by conducting large-scale GWAS meta-analyses, and we validate our scores in out-of-sample prediction analyses. We achieve state-of-the-art predictive performance, consistently matching or outperforming academic and commercial benchmarks, with liability R2 reaching up to 0.21 (type 2 diabetes). The performance of a PGS for embryo screening depends on its predictive ability within-family, which can be lower than its prediction ability among unrelated individuals. However, very few disease PGSs have been tested within-family. We perform systematic within-family validation of our disease PGSs, finding no decrease in predictive performance within-family for 16 of 17 scores. PGS performance typically declines with genetic distance from training data, an effect that needs to be accounted for to give properly calibrated predictions across ancestries. We perform extensive calibration of our scores performance across different ancestries, finding improved cross-ancestry performance compared to previous approaches, especially in African and East Asian populations. This is likely due to the fact our scores are constructed using a method that incorporates functional genomic annotations on more than 7 million variants, enabling a degree of fine-mapping of causal variants shared across ancestries. We illustrate clinical utility through examining the risk reduction that could be achieved through embryo screening for type 2 diabetes: selecting among 10 embryos is expected to reduce absolute disease risk by 12-20% in families where both parents are affected, with similar relative risk reductions across ancestries. These findings establish a framework for implementing PGS in reproductive medicine while demonstrating both the technologys potential for disease prevention and the methodological standards required for responsible clinical translation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic risk score prediction accuracy convergence 97%
- Multivariate adaptive shrinkage improves cross-population transcriptome prediction for transcriptome-wide association studies in underrepresented populations 96%
- Inclusion of Variants Discovered from Diverse Populations Improves Polygenic Risk Score Transferability 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative polygenic risk score improves the prediction accuracy of complex traits and diseases 97%
- Incorporating family history of disease improves polygenic risk scores in diverse populations 97%
- Polygenic scores capture genetic modification of the adiposity-cardiometabolic risk factor relationship 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.