Title: Associations between loneliness and outcomes of Common Mental Disorders (CMDs): A systematic review of longitudinal studies
Stefanidou, T.; Evlat, G.; Gray, H.; Lagan, K.; Harju-Seppanen, J.; Osullivan, M.; Talwar, S.; Lewis, G.; Buckman, J. E. J.; Pitman, A.; Johnson, S.; Lloyd-Evans, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundLoneliness has been increasingly associated with poor mental health outcomes, yet its prognostic role in people with Common Mental Disorders (CMDs) remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to examine whether loneliness is longitudinally associated with mental health outcomes in individuals with CMDs, regardless of treatment status. MethodsWe searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL from inception to May 2024 for longitudinal studies examining associations between baseline loneliness and CMD outcomes at follow-up. Eligible studies included adults aged 16+ with CMDs. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Due to heterogeneity in population and outcomes, a narrative synthesis was conducted. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023410401). ResultsSeventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies investigated depression-related outcomes (n=13), with fewer addressing suicidal ideation (n=5), anxiety (n=2), and mixed CMD outcomes (n=1). Several studies contributed data to more than one outcome category. We found that high baseline loneliness was consistently associated with poorer depression-related outcomes at follow-up in people with CMDs. This association was observed across clinical, community, and treatment settings. In contrast, evidence for suicidal ideation and anxiety outcomes was limited and mixed, with inconsistent associations and lower study quality. Only two studies examined treatment outcomes, with mixed findings on whether loneliness influenced intervention response. Overall, the GRADE certainty of evidence was high for depression, low for suicidal ideation, and very low for anxiety and mixed CMD outcomes. ConclusionsLoneliness appears to be a consistent prognostic factor for poor depression outcomes in people with CMDs, highlighting its potential relevance for assessment and intervention. However, its role in anxiety, suicidality, and treatment response remains unclear. Further high-quality longitudinal research is needed to clarify whether--and under what conditions--loneliness affects broader CMD outcomes and treatment effectiveness.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 97%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 97%
- Social connectedness as a determinant of mental health: A scoping review 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the Efficacy and Potential of Large Language Models for Depression: A Systematic Review 94%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- The prevalence of probable mental health disorders among hospital healthcare workers during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 95%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 96%
- Longitudinal changes in home confinement and mental health implications: A 17-month follow-up study in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 94%
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 94%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.