Machine learning for medication error detection: a scoping review protocol
Heche, F.; Yazdani, A.; Ferdowsi, S.; Kabak, R.; Mu, G.; Teodoro, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundMedication errors pose a significant threat to public health. Despite efforts by health agencies and the implementation of various interventions, such as staff training, medication reconciliation, and automation, the persistence of these incidents highlights the need for more effective, scalable solutions. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising approach in healthcare, offering potential to detect and predict medication errors, through data-driven insights. ObjectiveThis scoping review aims to systematically map the existing literature on ML-based approaches to predict or detect medication errors across all stages of the medication use process. The review seeks to identify the range of ML applications in this domain, characterize methodological trends, and highlight current knowledge gaps. The findings will provide a structured and accessible overview for both clinicians and researchers, supporting the development of safer, more data-informed medication practices. Method and analysisThe review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline. Structured searches will be performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used to identify eligible studies. Key information - including ML model, data sources and type, evaluation methods, and clinical context - will be extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics, visualizations, thematic analysis, and narrative synthesis. Study registrationThis protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/38SFY).
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Determining prescriptions in electronic health care (EHR) data: methods for development of standardised, reproducible drug codelists 94%
- Enhancing Research Data Infrastructure to Address the Opioid Epidemic: The Opioid Overdose Network (02-Net) 92%
- Development and Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for the Detection of Emergency Department Patients with Opioid Misuse from Clinical Notes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 94%
- Common misconceptions held by health researchers when interpreting linear regression assumptions, a cross-sectional study 93%
- Assessment of knowledge and perception of prescribers towards rational medicine use in the Ashanti Region of Ghana 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 92%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 91%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of CancelRx on Discontinuation of Controlled Substance Prescriptions 93%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 91%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.