Back

Barriers and Enablers to Physical Activity in Adults and Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A National Survey and Theoretical Mapping

Cockcroft, E.; Bright, C.; Nathan, H.; Farrow, D.; Russon, C.; Pulsford, R.; Andrews, R.

2025-08-07 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.08.05.25333022
Show abstract

Aims: to identify and compare barriers and enablers influencing physical activity (PA) in adults and children with type 1 diabetes in the UK. Methods: A cross-sectional, national survey was distributed via BreakthroughT1D (formerly JDRF) networks between December 2022 and January 2023. The survey included closed and open-ended questions on PA behaviours and influencing factors. Responses were collected from adults with T1D and parents of children with type 1 diabetes. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and two-proportion z-tests. Free-text responses were analysed thematically. Barriers and enablers were synthesised using the COM-B model and socioecological framework to identify behavioural determinants and intervention targets. Results: 311 responses were analysed (182 adults; 129 parent proxies for children). Stigma and negative comments were reported by nearly three-quarters of both groups. Adults more frequently reported clinical and motivational barriers: fear of hypoglycaemia (53%) and lack of motivation (39%). Adults reported significantly less healthcare provider support for physical activity (24%) compared to children (57%), revealing a critical care gap. Children more frequently reported external barriers, including lack of education among coaches (31%). Conclusion: this is the first UK-wide study to comprehensively compare barriers and enablers across age groups. Stigma in physical activity and sports settings emerges as a major, under-recognised barrier requiring urgent attention. Multi-level interventions are required, targeting individual knowledge and motivation alongside systemic changes. These should include mandatory diabetes education for coaches and teachers, policy enforcement to address discrimination, and enhanced healthcare provider support for physical activity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
21.5%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 7%
13.5%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 47%
11.0%
4
European Journal of Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 9%
4.8%
6
BJGP Open
based on 12 papers
Top 0.5%
3.0%
7
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Archives of Disease in Childhood
based on 15 papers
Top 0.8%
2.7%
9
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 9%
2.6%
10
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
11
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
based on 15 papers
Top 1.0%
1.9%
12
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
13
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
16
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
20
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 19%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 20%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 82%
0.9%
23
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 12%
0.7%