Provision of key components of palliative care in everyday practice in Dutch hospitals
van Velzen, N.; Heipon, C.; Boddaert, M.; Kazimier, H.; van der Linden, Y.; Reyners, A.; Stoppelenburg, A.; van der Vorst, M.; Wagemans, M.; Wiegersma, S.; Brom, L.; Raijmakers, N.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine the provision of key components of palliative care (PC) in Dutch hospitals, and to identify associated hospital- and specialist palliative care team (SPCT) characteristics. Materials and methodsSPCTs from all 72 Dutch hospitals were invited to an online survey about PC practices in their hospital. The survey was conducted from January to March 2024. Data from a cross-sectional national survey among Dutch hospital-SPCTs was used. The survey included questions about hospital- and SPCT characteristics, and the current provision of key components of PC in hospitals, namely advance care planning (ACP) and routine symptom monitoring. Hospitals with and without implemented ACP and routine symptom monitoring were compared. ResultsIn total 58 hospitals participated (81%), with a median annual admission of 20,456 inpatients (IQR 12,787) and a median SPCT referral rate of 1.4% (IQR 1.4%) of annual admissions. Routine ACP discussions were held in 58% of hospitals, with 12% consistently implementing ACP across the hospital. No differences in hospital- and SPCT characteristics were found between hospitals with or without routine ACP discussions. In 59% of hospitals, symptoms of outpatients were screened using a tool. These hospitals had both a higher SPCT referral rate (1.7% vs. 1.1%, p<0.05) and more inpatient SPCT referrals compared to those without monitoring (median of 330 (IQR 199) vs. 175 (IQR 279), p<0.05). Moreover, hospitals with routine symptom monitoring were more likely to offer an internship with SPCTs (70% vs 35%) and PC education (61% vs 17%) compared to those without (p<0.05). ConclusionsRoutine ACP discussions and symptom monitoring in outpatients do not yet seem common practice in Dutch hospitals. SPCTs can play an important role to further implement these key elements, together with guidelines, educational programs and a digital infrastructure for reporting and sharing outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 94%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 93%
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping rehabilitation pathways after cardiac surgery: Identifying key points for patient involvement and gaps in care 94%
- Raising the bar for patient experience during care transitions in Canada: A repeated cross-sectional survey evaluating a patient-oriented discharge summary at Ontario hospitals 93%
- Attributing non-specific symptoms to cancer in general practice: a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Response and role of palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national telephone survey of hospices in Italy 93%
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services 91%
- ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multi-national survey (CovPall) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of an online training program for palliative care in India 91%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 91%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 91%
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 91%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.