"Backed into a Corner": Lived experiences of receiving and providing involuntary psychiatric treatment under British Columbia's Mental Health Act
Snow, M. E.; Salmon, A.; Banjo, J.; Morrow, M.; Varcoe, C.
Show abstract
British Columbias Mental Health Act permits the involuntarily detention and treatment of individuals who meet specific criteria. Over the past 15 years, British Columbia has seen an increasing trend in the number of involuntary psychiatric admissions. This qualitative study explores the lived experiences of people receiving and providing involuntary psychiatric treatment within two health organizations in British Columbia, Canada. Five focus groups were conducted with 23 individuals who had previously received involuntary psychiatric treatment at a facility operated by one of the two health organizations. All sessions were facilitated by individuals with lived experience of involuntary psychiatric treatment. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 clinical staff and 10 non-clinical support personnel involved in delivering involuntary psychiatric treatment. Data were analyzed using a thematic approach. Seven key themes were generated, including the limited availability of voluntary care options, the compounding role of social determinants of health in mental health crises, the lack of conclusive evidence supporting involuntary psychiatric treatment, the negative impacts on both patients and providers, and the critical role of peer support. These findings underscore the need for systemic reform to reduce reliance on coercive practices and to expand access to voluntary, community-based mental health supports that address underlying social and structural factors contributing to mental health crises.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 97%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 97%
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 98%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 98%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- “ A Man Never Cries ”: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Gender Differences in Depression and Alcohol Use in Moshi, Tanzania 95%
- Mental health services implementation in Colombia – a systematic review 94%
- “ When a man drinks alcohol it’s cool but when a woman drinks she is a hoe ”: A Qualitative Exploration of Alcohol, Gender, Stigma, and Sexual Assault in Moshi, Tanzania 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 97%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 96%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Views about integrating smoking cessation treatment within psychological services for patients with common mental illness: a multi-perspective qualitative study 94%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 93%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.