Stakeholder and end-user perspectives to improve the Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ) to measure broad health
Boelens, M.; Roumen, C.; Bloemen-van Gurp, E. J.; Dierx, J.; Nahar-van Venrooij, L.; van Zutphen, T.; Christiaanse, P. M. R.; Schnitzer, J.; van den Akker-van Marle, M. E.; de Kleijn, M. J. J.; van Vliet, M.; Kiefte-de Jong, J. C.; Spreeuwenberg, M. D.
Show abstract
IntroductionBroad health concepts are increasingly embedded in healthcare and other domains. Therefore, in a previous study, we developed and validated the Context-Sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ). The CPHQ is based on Positive Health, the Capability Approach and on perspectives of stakeholders and end-users, including those with a lower socioeconomic position (SEP) with the aim to validly measure broad health. Stakeholders and end-users were involved in the development process. However pronfessionals working in healthcare, welfare or policy domain were not sufficiently involved while their perspective on how to measure broad health is needed to support broader applicability and acceptability. ObjectiveWe aimed to refine the 32-item CPHQ by incorporating the perspectives of a broader group of stakeholders across healthcare, welfare and policy domains, researchers, as well as patients and citizens, including those from a lower SEP, so that the instrument is suitable for use in diverse domains and population groups. MethodsWe conducted nine focus group discussions with stakeholders from healthcare, welfare, and policy domains, research, patients and (lower SEP) citizens. An adapted COMET method analysis and qualitative analysis were used followed by a member check took to validate the changes. ResultsThe refined CPHQ consists of 28 items. Items were omitted, merged or added. Participants emphasized the importance of avoiding normative phrasing and including subjectively interpretable items. Items reflecting aspects of experienced health (e.g., "I feel happy" or "I feel healthy") were prioritized, highlighting the relevance of functionings. At the same time, views diverged on the inclusion and wording of items related to exclusion, political representation and sense of belonging. ConclusionThe CPHQ refinement involved a wide range of stakeholders including end-users. This led to a 28-item CPHQ to measure broad health. Future research in different populations and settings is needed to validate and possibly shorten the refined CPHQ.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing wellbeing in young people during COVID-19: A survey with 6291 young people in Wales 94%
- “It’s hard to keep a distance when you’re with someone you really care about” — a qualitative study of adolescents’ pandemic-related health literacy and how Covid-19 affects their lives 93%
- Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 93%
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 92%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 92%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Needs Assessment: Development of a Simplified Risk Probability Scale (SRPS) Design for Rapid Mental Health Screening in Emergency Frontline Rescue Teams 91%
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 91%
- A protocol for a systematic critical realist synthesis of school mindfulness interventions designed to promote pupils’ mental wellbeing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 95%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 94%
- How did people cope during the COVID-19 pandemic? A Structural Topic Modelling Analysis of Free-Text Data from 11,000 UK Adults 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.