Back

Stakeholder and end-user perspectives to improve the Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ) to measure broad health

Boelens, M.; Roumen, C.; Bloemen-van Gurp, E. J.; Dierx, J.; Nahar-van Venrooij, L.; van Zutphen, T.; Christiaanse, P. M. R.; Schnitzer, J.; van den Akker-van Marle, M. E.; de Kleijn, M. J. J.; van Vliet, M.; Kiefte-de Jong, J. C.; Spreeuwenberg, M. D.

2025-08-02 public and global health
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332588 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionBroad health concepts are increasingly embedded in healthcare and other domains. Therefore, in a previous study, we developed and validated the Context-Sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ). The CPHQ is based on Positive Health, the Capability Approach and on perspectives of stakeholders and end-users, including those with a lower socioeconomic position (SEP) with the aim to validly measure broad health. Stakeholders and end-users were involved in the development process. However pronfessionals working in healthcare, welfare or policy domain were not sufficiently involved while their perspective on how to measure broad health is needed to support broader applicability and acceptability. ObjectiveWe aimed to refine the 32-item CPHQ by incorporating the perspectives of a broader group of stakeholders across healthcare, welfare and policy domains, researchers, as well as patients and citizens, including those from a lower SEP, so that the instrument is suitable for use in diverse domains and population groups. MethodsWe conducted nine focus group discussions with stakeholders from healthcare, welfare, and policy domains, research, patients and (lower SEP) citizens. An adapted COMET method analysis and qualitative analysis were used followed by a member check took to validate the changes. ResultsThe refined CPHQ consists of 28 items. Items were omitted, merged or added. Participants emphasized the importance of avoiding normative phrasing and including subjectively interpretable items. Items reflecting aspects of experienced health (e.g., "I feel happy" or "I feel healthy") were prioritized, highlighting the relevance of functionings. At the same time, views diverged on the inclusion and wording of items related to exclusion, political representation and sense of belonging. ConclusionThe CPHQ refinement involved a wide range of stakeholders including end-users. This led to a 28-item CPHQ to measure broad health. Future research in different populations and settings is needed to validate and possibly shorten the refined CPHQ.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.