Back

Beyond Symptoms: WHODAS as a Biopsychosocial Measure to Complement Functioning Assessment in Parkinsons Disease

Pereira, N.; Dias, R.; Cirilo, K.; Nascimento, I. A. P. d. S.; Bocicovar, R.; Santana, C.; Matos, L.; Fidelis, F.; Thomazella, G.; Aranha, L.; Santos, G.; Helene, A. F.; Roque, A. C.; Eggers, C.; Piemonte, M. E. P.

2025-08-01 neurology
10.1101/2025.07.31.25331974
Show abstract

Functionality is considered the third health indicator, complementing the traditional mortality and morbidity metrics. However, functionality is rarely assessed systematically in Parkinsons disease (PD) clinical practice and research, where symptom-based scales predominate. Identifying declines across various dimensions of functionality in PD is essential for patient education, disease management, and guiding new intervention strategies. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a comprehensive assessment tool developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to standardize the measurement of functionality and disability impacts across diverse health conditions and cultural contexts. This study aimed to characterize functionality across PD severity stages using the WHODAS 2.0, independent of age, sex, socioeconomic status (SEC), and education. A total of 352 patients were divided into four clinically severity PD stage groups according to the Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) scale. The age, sex, SEC and education levels were controlled to guarantee paired groups. All participants were evaluated remotely using the Telephone - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale, Part I (MDS-UPDRS I) and Part II (MDS-UPDRS II) and WHODAS 2.0. The most affected functionality dimensions were Mobility, Activities of Daily Life related to the Household, and Participation. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant effect of the group for all functionality dimensions. Notably, Mobility, Activities of Daily Life related to the Household, and Self-Care showed a gradual decline starting from stage 1 of H&Y. In contrast, Cognition, Getting Along and Participation exhibited progressive impairment only from stage 2 of H&Y. This study is the first to describe functionality in PD using WHODAS 2.0 across severity stages controlling for key demographic factors. Findings highlight that WHODAS captures functional limitations not identified by symptom-focused scales such as MDS-UPDRS. Incorporating WHODAS into routine assessment may improve patient-centered care by informing interventions targeting functional limitations from early disease stages. HighlightsWHODAS 2.0 captures functionality domains not assessed by MDS-UPDRS. Functional decline in mobility, self-care, and household tasks starts at early PD stages. Participation, cognition, and interpersonal relationships decline from stage 2 onwards. Functionality decline is independent of age, sex, education, and socioeconomic status. WHODAS provides a biopsychosocial assessment essential for person-centered PD care.

Matching journals

1
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
#1
190× avg
2
Movement Disorders
Wiley · based on 49 published papers
Top 0.5%
59× avg
3
npj Parkinson's Disease
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 35 published papers
Top 0.3%
85× avg
4
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 63%
6.2%
5
Journal of Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 0.6%
26× avg
6
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 6%
4.2× avg
7
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 58%
2.6%
8
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
22× avg
9
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Wiley · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
10
Annals of Neurology
Wiley · based on 43 published papers
Top 3%
11× avg
11
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 42%
1.5%
12
SLEEP
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.5%
28× avg
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
14
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
BMJ · based on 26 published papers
Top 4%
5.7× avg
15
Gait & Posture
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
9.3× avg
16
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
17
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Elsevier BV · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
18
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
Top 6%
2.9× avg
19
European Journal of Neurology
Wiley · based on 20 published papers
Top 3%
9.1× avg
20
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
SAGE Publications · based on 23 published papers
Top 3%
4.8× avg
21
Neurobiology of Disease
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
8.7× avg
22
Neurobiology of Aging
Elsevier BV · based on 29 published papers
Top 4%
4.0× avg