Computational investigation suggests that the cell adhesion sub-proteome is enriched for sites of pH-dependence and charge burial, whilst some key intracellular pathways may be shielded from pH fluctuations.
Sallah, S.; Warwicker, J.
Show abstract
Prediction of protein pH-dependence is generally made for individual proteins or pathways, and is also increasingly being used to aid protein functional design. Combining high-throughput pKa prediction methods with AlphaFold models allows pH-dependence to be studied across a proteome. Here, two methods and a variety of features for detecting pH-dependence and charge burial that is physiologically relevant, have been applied to human proteins. Predictions are effective for a small benchmark subset of well-characterised proteins and, more broadly, identify an overlap between features associated with pH-dependence and enzymes and transporters. The most informative filters are those describing relatively buried ionisable groups, with pKas close to neutral pH and/or involvement in highly-coupled charge networks. The question is addressed of which human proteins not annotated as enzymes or transporters, are predicted to have these features of predicted pH-dependence and/or charge networking. A striking feature from gene ontology analysis of those proteins is a predicted enrichment at the cell periphery, in particular an association with cell adhesion, including protein families not currently known to exhibit pH-dependence. Gene ontology classifications that are depleted for proteins with buried charge networks and/or predicted functional pH-dependence, include some associated with ribosomal and nuclear structure. This overall result suggests a possible general resilience of some key processes to pH fluctuations, whilst not precluding specific instances where signalling pathways have evolved responses to pH changes. A drawback of the study is restriction to protomer models, thus omitting groups that mediate pH-dependence through burial at an interface. However predictions are already notable, with their details provided for experimental design.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational investigation of missense somatic mutations in cancer and potential links to pH-dependence and proteostasis 96%
- Conserved intramolecular networks in GDAP1 are closely connected to CMT-linked mutations and protein stability 95%
- Automated prediction of site and sequence of protein modification with ATRP initiators 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Solvation of the E. coli CheY Phosphorylation SiteMapped by XFMS 95%
- In-Pero: Exploiting deep learning embeddings of protein sequences to predict the localisation of peroxisomal proteins 94%
- Experimentally determined long intrinsically disordered protein regions are now abundant in the Protein Data Bank 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicted pH-dependent stability of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trimer from interfacial acidic groups 95%
- Evolutionary progression of collective mutations in Omicron sub-lineages towards efficient RBD-hACE2: allosteric communications between and within viral and human proteins 94%
- SpatialPPI: three-dimensional space protein-protein interaction prediction with AlphaFold Multimer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of spatial structure on protein damage susceptibility - A bioinformatics approach 96%
- Predicting human and viral protein variants affecting COVID-19 susceptibility and repurposing therapeutics 94%
- VirtuousPocketome: A Computational Tool for Screening Protein-ligand Complexes to Identify Similar Binding Sites 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.