Back

Purity and stability of modified nucleosides in the context of accurate quantification by LC-MS

Kerkhoff, K.; Wesseling, H.; Qi, Y.; Liu, K.; Berg, M.; Rusling, L.; Zipse, H.; Kaiser, S.

2025-08-02 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.30.667630 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reliable quantification of RNA modifications depends on the chemical integrity of synthetic nucleoside standards, yet little is known about their shelf life in aqueous solution. We systematically assessed the short-term stability of 44 canonical and modified nucleosides by LC-UV-MS after storage at -80 {degrees}C, -20 {degrees}C, 8 {degrees}C, 20 {degrees}C and 40 {degrees}C for up to six months. While canonical nucleosides remained chemically intact, thirteen biologically relevant modifications decomposed in a temperature-dependent manner. 4-thiouridine underwent desulfurisation and dimerisation, 3-methylcytidine deaminated to 3-methyluridine, and N4-acetylcytidine hydrolysed to cytidine followed by deamination to uridine. mcm5s2U displayed desulfurisation, whereas i6A showed low-level de-prenylation. High-resolution MS established accurate formulas for all degradation products. In order to provide a quantitative basis for nucleoside stability, reaction free energies ({Delta}G298) for four known decomposition reactions, namely deglycosylation, deamination, deacetylation and desulfurisation, were determined in solution phase quantum chemical calculations. The free energies of these reactions correlate well with the experimental data. All plates remain archived and will be re-analysed at 12, 24 and 36 months to establish long-term rate constants. Our data offer practical guidance for the handling of labile standards and present kinetic parameters that will improve inter-laboratory comparability in RNA modification research.

Published in Nucleic Acids Research (predicted rank #13) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.