Colorectal adenoma presence is associated with decreased menaquinone pathway functions in the gut microbiome of patients undergoing routine colonoscopy
Vilkote, I.; Silamikelis, I.; Klovins, J.; Tolmanis, I.; Lejnieks, A.; Runce, E.; Cebere, K.; Margole, K.; Sjomina-Gubareva, O.; Silamikele, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common malignancies worldwide, with colorectal adenomas recognized as well-established precursors to CRC. Changes in gut microbiota appear to be linked to CRC by promoting chronic inflammation, immune dysfunction, and metabolic issues that drive tumor growth and progression. ObjectivesTo explore the relationship between gut microbiome composition and the presence of colorectal adenomas in patients undergoing routine colonoscopy. Materials and methodsPatients were selected from those receiving standard colonoscopy based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, to minimize potential confounding factors such as previous colorectal surgeries, inflammatory bowel diseases, and the use of antibiotics or probiotics. Fecal samples were collected before bowel preparation for the colonoscopy procedure, and metagenomic shotgun sequencing was used to analyze the composition and functions of the gut microbiome. ResultsOverall, 136 participants were recruited, and 56 of them had colorectal adenomas. Although no distinction was observed in alpha diversity, beta diversity analysis indicated significant differences between the adenoma-positive and adenoma-negative groups. Signs of dysbiosis were found in patients with adenomas: increased abundance of the genera Bacteroides and Prevotella and decreased abundance of Faecalibacterium and Anaerostipes species. Beta diversity analysis showed statistically significant differences in the structure of the microbiota. Significant differences in the relative abundance of UBA7597 sp003448195 were observed between groups. Functionally, decreased vitamin K2, SCFA (propionate) synthesis, along with lower Stickland fermentation activity was observed, indicating altered microbial metabolism. These changes may compromise epithelial barrier support, anti-inflammatory signaling, and energy metabolism in the colon. ConclusionsThe discovery of microbial taxa and functional pathways associated with the presence of adenomas underscores the potential of microbiota-based biomarkers and therapeutic strategies in the prevention and management of colorectal cancer.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dietary cystine restriction increases the proliferative capacity of the small intestine of mice 95%
- Impact of time and temperature on gut microbiota and SCFA composition in stool samples 94%
- MinION Sequencing of colorectal cancer tumour microbiomes - a comparison with amplicon-based and RNA-Sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, swab and mucosal tissue samples 95%
- Using fecal immunochemical tubes for the analysis of gut microbiome has potential to improve colorectal cancer screening 95%
- Effect of ginger supplementation on the fecal microbiome in subjects with prior colorectal adenoma 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of an Indian colorectal cancer faecal microbiome collection demonstrates universal colorectal cancer-associated patterns, but closest correlation with other Indian cohorts. 95%
- Gut microbiota analyses of Saudi populations for type 2 diabetes-related phenotypes reveals significant association 95%
- Long-term impact of fecal transplantation in healthy volunteers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inverse association between serum vitamin B12 level and abundance of potential B12-producing gut microbes in Indian children 94%
- Host Genetic Background and Gut Microbiota Contribute to Differential Metabolic Responses to High Fructose Consumption in Mice 93%
- Fecal metagenomics to identify biomarkers of food intake in healthy adults: Findings from randomized, controlled, nutrition trials 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.