Back

GeoGAT-site: A Face-Centered Geometric Graph Attention Network for Protein-Protein Interface Prediction

Long, X.; Yang, Q.; Dong, W.; Li, X.; Wang, K.; Dong, S.; Luo, G.; Zhang, X.; Yang, T.; Gao, X.

2025-07-31 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.07.28.667136 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) underpin the intricate machinery of cellular life, orchestrating processes from signal transduction to metabolic regulation, yet their precise interface prediction remains a cornerstone challenge in structural biology, demanding scalable computational paradigms that balance accuracy and efficiency. Herein, we present GeoGAT-site, a pioneering geometric graph attention network that leverages face-centered surface fingerprints extracted from three-dimensional protein architectures to forecast interaction sites. Diverging from conventional vertex-centric approaches, our face-centered methodology achieves a 3.64-fold acceleration in patch generation, mitigating computational bottlenecks while preserving granular surface descriptors. At its core, GeoGAT-site incorporates a bespoke attention mechanism that adaptively modulates inter-facial distances and normal vector orientations, synergistically integrating spatial geometries with physicochemical attributes for nuanced interface delineation. Harnessing a meticulously curated dataset of 150 million face-centered fingerprints from over 20,000 structurally diverse proteins, the model attains robust generalization across heterogeneous interaction motifs. Empirical validation on an independent cohort of 167 protein complexes yields a ROC AUC of 0.89, surpassing established benchmarks including MaSIF-site (0.845), SPPIDER (0.65), and PSIVER (0.63). By furnishing high-fidelity interface annotations, GeoGAT-site augments downstream structural modeling paradigms through targeted constraints, thereby providing a versatile scaffold for unraveling PPI dynamics with profound implications for therapeutic discovery, protein redesign, and molecular epistemology.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.