Evaluating user-operated tests of audible contrast sensitivity towards efficient hearing healthcare services
Sanchez-Lopez, R.; Zaar, J.; Laugesen, S.
Show abstract
The user-operated audiometry (UAud) project aims at introducing an automated system for user-operated audiometric testing into everyday clinical practice. Here, we focus on the Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT) test, which has been proposed as a language-independent alternative to aided speech-in-noise tests. Five distinct user-operated ACT (U-ACT) test candidates were evaluated in terms of performance, reliability, and usability against two established test benchmarks. The study involved 28 participants with diverse hearing and cognitive abilities. The results demonstrated that the primary factor influencing the reliability of test results was the type of task. In terms of usability, the participants reported positive experience with all test candidates, with the Yes/No task resulting in the lowest perceived difficulty and best understanding. Overall, a test candidate with a custom adaptive procedure inspired by audiologists experiences with ACT was chosen for the UAud protocol as a user-operated test of hearing-in-noise perception.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Identification of Tinnitus Malingering Based on Overt and Covert Behavioral Responses During Psychoacoustic Testing 94%
- Quantifying Device Type and Handedness Biases in a Remote Parkinson’s Disease AI-Powered Assessment 92%
- A Deep Learning Based Smartphone Application for Early Detection of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Endoscopic Images 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT in pediatric audiology as rated by students and experts 94%
- Neural adaptation at stimulus onset and speed of neural processing as critical contributors to speech comprehension independent of hearing threshold or age 94%
- Applicability of a short form of the Speech, Spatial und Qualities of Hearing Scale in 97 individuals with Meniere's disease in a multicentric registry 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.