Back

Reprogrammed E. coli for secretion of thermophilic cellulase cocktail for seawater-compatible lignocellulosic bioprocessing

Gupta, M.; Sarkar, A.; C, S.; Chatterjee, D.; Datta, S.

2025-07-30 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.07.27.664954 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of efficient cellulase systems is crucial for sustainable lignocellulosic biorefining. In this study, we engineered Escherichia coli to co-express and secrete a thermophilic cellulase cocktail consisting of a Bacillus licheniformis processive endoglucanase (H1AD14), a Chaetomium thermophilum cellobiohydrolase (G0SAE6), and a glucose-tolerant engineered {beta}-glucosidase B8CYA8tm (V169C/E173L/I246A B8CYA8) from Halothermothrix orenii. Fusion with the AnsB secretion tag enabled extracellular yields of 0.2-0.4 g/L for each enzyme, bypassing costly purification while retaining activity. The secretion was confirmed via immunoblotting using anti-His antibody, and catalytic activity was validated through enzymatic assays. The absence of E. coli native periplasmic maltose-binding protein (detected with anti-MBP antibody) in the extracellular medium ruled out cell lysis, confirming protein secretion. Using the Golden Gate assembly, we constructed and systematically evaluated synergistic enzyme combinations for hydrolytic performance. By optimizing secretion conditions, including media, inducer concentration, and incubation temperature, the total yield of secreted enzyme cocktail increased from 0.31 g/L to 0.74 g/L. The secreted cocktail effectively hydrolysed diverse lignocellulosic substrates and exhibited 100 % activity in seawater, demonstrating potential for freshwater-independent biorefining. The work addresses key economic and environmental challenges in biomass conversion by integrating secretion engineering, thermostability, and seawater tolerance into a single scalable system.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.