Back

Subcordal Stenosis: A Glucocorticoid-Responsive Subtype of Autoimmune Laryngeal Stenosis

Denvir, B.; Burgess, B.; Motz, K.; Best, S. R.; Akst, L. M.; Antiochos, B.; Seo, P.; Hillel, A. T.

2025-07-25 otolaryngology
10.1101/2025.07.25.25332220 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAs our understanding of autoimmune laryngeal stenosis evolves, distinguishing patients who may benefit from systemic immunosuppression versus those needing only local treatment is increasingly important. In this study, we identify a distinct subset of autoimmune laryngeal stenosis characterized by edema of the inferior true vocal folds that extends to the superior aspect of the cricoid cartilage, termed "subcordal stenosis." The objective of this study is to characterize the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of subcordal stenosis and compare it to typical autoimmune-related subglottic stenosis (AI-SGS). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients with laryngeal stenosis evaluated by both rheumatology and otolaryngology at our institution to identify two groups: patients with subcordal stenosis and those with typical AI-SGS. Data on immunosuppressive treatments and airway dilation procedures were collected. Time to first dilation was compared between groups. ResultsAmong 49 patients with laryngeal stenosis, 11 had subcordal involvement. Five of these also had subglottic disease, while six had isolated subcordal stenosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly longer time to first dilation in patients with subcordal involvement (median 792 vs. 44 days; p = 0.048). They also underwent fewer dilations within two years (median 0 vs. 1; p = 0.05). ConclusionAmong laryngeal stenosis patients referred to rheumatology, those with subcordal involvement experienced fewer dilations and longer intervals before first dilation compared to those with typical AI-SGS. These findings suggest that subcordal stenosis may represent a distinct, glucocorticoid-responsive phenotype within autoimmune laryngeal stenosis, with implications for treatment selection and multidisciplinary care.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.6%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
7
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
9
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
10
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
11
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
12
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
13
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
23
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%