Nanopore sequencing enables highly accurate genotyping and identification of resistance determinants in key nosocomial pathogens
Cottingham, H.; Judd, L. M.; Harshegyi-Hand, T.; Wisniewski, J. A.; Blakeway, L. V.; Hong, T.; Parker, M. H.; Peleg, A. Y.; Holt, K. E.; Hawkey, J.; Macesic, N.
Show abstract
Whole genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens can positively impact infectious disease management in clinical contexts, both in individual settings and assisting infection prevention efforts. However, logistical issues have often prevented its translation into clinical settings. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platforms are flexible, affordable, and now offer accuracy comparable to other sequencing platforms, making them uniquely well-suited for clinical bacterial isolate sequencing. We sought to determine the best methods for implementing ONT sequencing into clinical settings by benchmarking multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), core genome MLST (cgMLST), antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and core genome single nucleotide polymorphism (cgSNP) typing against the genomic gold standard. We sequenced 199 Enterobacterales isolates with Illumina and ONT platforms and assessed performance based on sequencing chemistry, basecaller, basecalling model, assembly status, assembly polishing and sequencing depth. Modern ONT data generated perfect MLST and AMR allelic variant calls, and correctly classified a median of 99.5% of cgMLST loci. Illumina and kmer-based SNP typing failed to call 9-68 SNPs per 1000 sites due to poor sensitivity in repetitive regions of the reference genome, while ONTs long reads generated perfect SNP calls across the entire genome using simulated readsets. Using real sequencing data to identify putative transmission pairs, ONT read-based methods were concordant with traditional Illumina approaches in 155-158/158 (98.1-100%) of isolate pairs. We also provide specific recommendations on sequencing depth and basecalling model based on the time and computational resources available to the user. This study demonstrates the viability of modern ONT data for highly accurate characterisation of bacterial pathogens while providing an actionable framework for clinical implementation.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Resolving plasmid-encoded carbapenem resistance dynamics and reservoirs in a hospital setting through nanopore sequencing 97%
- Exact mapping of Illumina blind spots in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome reveals platform-wide and workflow-specific biases 96%
- Read trimming has minimal effect on bacterial SNP calling accuracy 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying indels from WGS short reads of haploid genomes distinguishes variant-calling algorithms 97%
- Accurate and Reproducible Whole-Genome Genotyping for Bacterial Genomic Surveillance with Nanopore Sequencing Data 96%
- Transmission and antibiotic resistance of Achromobacter in cystic fibrosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of an amplicon nanopore sequencing strategy for detection of mutations conferring intermediate resistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus strains 96%
- Species-wide phylogenomics of the Staphylococcus aureus agr operon reveals convergent evolution of frameshift mutations 96%
- A comparison of short-read, HiFi long-read, and hybrid strategies for genome-resolved metagenomics 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.