Developing best practice rare disease diagnostic care models in a real-world rural/regional setting
Akesson, L. S.; Parekh, S.; Alderdice, A.; Jackson, H.; Bain, L.; Dudgeon, A.; Williamson, L. J.; Akesson, B. L.; Say, G.; Kellett, M. J.; Pope-Couston, R.; Wallis, M. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlthough individually rare, collectively rare diseases are more common than diabetes mellitus. The diagnostic odyssey for rare diseases is typically prolonged. AimWe aimed to hear the voice of rare disease stakeholders to provide evidence for strategies to improve rare disease care in Tasmania, Australia. MethodsMixed methods research with surveys, focus groups, and interviews captured the voice of healthcare consumers with rare disease, their families, and their caregivers, as well as consumer advocates, community reference group, rare disease researchers, and healthcare professionals. ResultsWe undertook 1,014 stakeholder consultations. Participants described elements of the diagnostic pathway that worked well, as well as barriers to diagnosis. Those affected by rare disease and their caregivers emphasised the need for healthcare providers to listen and respond to consumer concerns. Collectively, stakeholders reported that challenges in rare disease diagnosis in Tasmania include difficulties accessing timely primary and specialist health care, low awareness of rare disease among health professionals in Tasmania (including how to identify people with possible rare disease and what to do next), difficulty in accessing diagnostic testing, cost and geographic barriers in accessing diagnostic care, a lack of epidemiologic information on rare disease in Tasmania and the breakdown in care and support from the health system when transitioning from paediatric to adult services. DiscussionMany participant concerns that fall under the system responsibility of the Tasmanian Government could be addressed by establishing a Tasmanian Rare Care Centre. The centre could adopt principles from cancer care, such as patient-centred care, safe and quality care, multidisciplinary care, supportive care, care coordination, communication, and research and clinical trials. Other concerns, such as the equitable implementation of emerging diagnostic technologies and the education and training of non-genetics practitioners, will require national leadership and interjurisdictional cooperation to address. O_TEXTBOXSUMMARY BOXThe Known Rare diseases are a global health priority. The diagnostic odyssey is often prolonged, affecting rare disease care. The New Stakeholder consultation revealed that individuals affected by rare diseases and their families and caregivers often feel that they are not listened to, that their care is fragmented, and that non-genetics healthcare providers have limited awareness and understanding of rare disease. The Implications Many concerns raised by rare disease stakeholders could be addressed by establishing a Tasmanian Rare Care Centre. C_TEXTBOX
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a taxonomy of care coordination for people living with rare conditions: A qualitative study 94%
- Development of models of care coordination for rare conditions: A qualitative study 93%
- Good communication is critical to supporting people living and working with a rare disease: current rare disease support perceived as inadequate. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders 94%
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 92%
- ClinGen Variant Curation Interface Workshops: Training Variant Scientists on an International Platform 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 93%
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 93%
- The LMSz method - an automatable scalable approach to constructing gene-specific growth charts in rare disorders. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- General population screening for type 1 diabetes using islet autoantibodies at the preschool vaccination visit: a proof-of-concept study (the T1Early study) 92%
- Successful incorporation of a genetic risk prediction research platform into routine newborn screening 92%
- Trends in neural tube defects in Scotland 2000-2021 prior to the introduction of mandatory folic acid fortification of non-wholemeal wheat flour: a population-based study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feedback of Individual Genetic and Genomics Research Results: A Qualitative Study Involving Grassroots Communities in Uganda 94%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 91%
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.