Back

Skeletal muscle mitochondrial responses to a single bout and six weeks of high load versus high volume resistance training in previously trained men

Mueller, B.; Fox, C. D.; Parry, H. A.; Mesquita, P. H. C.; Vann, C. G.; Ruple, B. A.; Sexton, C. L.; Godwin, J. S.; McIntosh, M. M.; Beck, D. T.; Young, K. C.; Phillips, S. M.; Kavazis, A. N.; Roberts, M. D.

2025-07-29 physiology
10.1101/2025.07.23.666423 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The effects of higher-load (HL) versus higher-volume (HV) resistance training (RT) on various molecular outcomes are similar. However, mitochondrial responses remain understudied. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to interrogate mitochondrial mRNA and protein responses to acute and chronic HL versus HV RT. Vastus lateralis biopsies from resistance trained males in two prior studies were assessed. In STUDY 1, 11 college-aged men completed an acute bout of either HL or HV RT exercises to failure. Biopsies were collected at PRE, 3 hours post-, and 6 hours post-exercise. In STUDY 2, 15 college-aged men participated in six weeks of supervised unilateral RT where each leg was assigned to either HL or HV RT. Biopsies were collected from both legs prior to and 72 hours following last training bout of the intervention. Biopsies from both studies were used to assess mitochondrial mRNAs, and STUDY 2 biopsies were assayed for mitochondrial proteins and CS activity. Results from both studies revealed several significant main effects of time but no significant interactions. Additionally, CS activity, a surrogate of mitochondrial content, decreased following chronic RT (p=0.016) but no interaction was observed between the HV and HL leg over time (p=0.882). In conclusion, while RT resulted in both acute mitochondrial mRNA as well as chronic CS activity and mitochondrial protein responses, there were no differences in the HL versus HV paradigms on these outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
2
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
10
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%