What drives cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas? An AI-assisted answer using social media
Perez-Giron, J. C.; Navarro, C. J.; El ghouat, A.; Khaldi, R.; Lopez, D.; Arenas-Castro, S.; del Aguila, A.; Moreno-Llorca, R.; Piston, N.; Romero, L. F.; Vaz, A. S.; Tabik, S.; Martinez-Lopez, J.; Alcaraz-Segura, D.
Show abstract
High mountain protected areas (PAs) are increasingly recognized not only for their role in conserving biodiversity but also for their contribution to the provision of cultural ecosystem services (CES). Despite their relevance, CES remain underrepresented in conservation planning, particularly due to challenges in quantifying their spatial distribution. This study combines geolocated social media data and ecological niche models (ENMs) to assess the spatial patterns and key drivers of CES supply across eight mountain PAs spanning distinct biogeographical regions in Spain and Portugal. Using deep learning techniques to classify more than 200,000 photographs into ten CES categories, we evaluated model performance under two modeling approaches and identified the most influential environmental and social predictors. Most CES categories exhibited good model performance (Boyce index > 0.5), though variation existed across services and regions. Nature & Landscape and Gastronomy CES showed strong associations with park boundaries and human settlements, respectively, while Religious and Cultural CES were spatially linked to culturally significant landmarks.. Our findings demonstrate the potential of combining social media data with ENMs to map CES distributions and reveal both universal and context-dependent drivers. This approach offers valuable insights for integrating CES into PA management and spatial planning, supporting more holistic and culturally inclusive conservation strategies.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Land use and oriental pied hornbill occurrence in Singapore 94%
- Use of object detection in camera trap image identification: assessing a method to rapidly and accurately classify human and animal detections for research and application in recreation ecology 94%
- Area-based conservation planning in Japan: protected area network effectiveness to the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conservation networks do not match the ecological requirements of amphibians 95%
- Integrating biodiversity assessments into local conservation planning: the importance of assessing suitable data sources 95%
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of attacks around deaths of wolves: A statistical assessment of lethal control efficiency in France 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision analysis shows scientific and economic value of community-based monitoring in Madagascar 94%
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 94%
- An expert-based global assessment of threats and conservation measures for subterranean ecosystems 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using machine learning to count Antarctic shag (Leucocarbo bransfieldensis) nests on images captured by Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems 94%
- A workflow for microclimate sensor networks: integrating geographic tools, statistics, and local knowledge 93%
- From local spectral species to global spectral communities: a benchmark for ecosystem diversity estimate by remote sensing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advancements in monitoring: a comparison of traditional and application-based tools for measuring outdoor recreation 95%
- Using sentinel nodes to evaluate changing connectivity in a protected areas network 94%
- Identification of areas of very high biodiversity value to achieve the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 key commitments. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.