Back

From Black Box to Biological Insight: AttentioFuse Unlocks Multi-Omics Dynamics in Lung Cancer

Huang, Y.; Zhong, F.; Liu, L.; He, Y.

2025-07-26 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.07.23.665084 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), the major subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), exhibit distinct molecular landscapes that demand precision in prognosis and therapy. While deep learning models achieve high predictive accuracy, their "black-box" nature limits clinical translation. To address this, we propose AttentioFuse, an interpretable deep learning framework employing a Reactome-guided mid-fusion strategy for multi-omics integration. AttentioFuse innovates through three pillars: (1) dual-phase learning to preserve omics-specific patterns via independent sub-networks, (2) hierarchical attention mechanisms (cross-omics, feature-level, and fusion-layer) to dynamically quantify layer contributions, and (3) integrated explainability combining DeepSHAP and global attention weights for gene-to-pathway interpretation. Evaluated on TCGA LUAD/LUSC cohorts, AttentioFuse matches state-of-the-art performance in TNM staging, while uncovering actionable biological insights. The framework validates pan-NSCLC mechanisms like AKT/mTOR metabolic control and histology-divergent Notch signaling roles, while revealing novel pathways--developmental reactivation (T-stage), microbiota-driven metastasis (M-stage), and ECM remodeling--providing testable hypotheses for progression and personalized therapy. Crucially, AttentioFuse bridges computational predictions to clinical practice by proposing molecularly-guided combination therapies. This paradigm shifts toward interpretable-aware AI advances oncology by transforming black-box predictions into biologically grounded decision-support tools.

Published in Cancers (predicted rank #28) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.