Back

Do Distinct Subpopulations Signify Modes of Behavior in a Noisy Single Cell?

Holehouse, J.

2025-07-24 systems biology
10.1101/2025.07.22.666238 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Population-level distributions of fluorescence or molecule counts are often taken to reflect the behaviors of individual cells within that population. In this article, we argue that counting sub-populations can be a misleading proxy for identifying the number of behavioral modes accessible to individual cells within a system. We show that definitions of behavioral modes based on deterministic modeling can fail when fluctuations in a systems state--or noise--become significant. In such cases, peaks in the probability distribution--emerging from stochastic descriptions--are often interpreted as substitutes for deterministically defined stable modes. However, we demonstrate that this interpretation can break down: it is possible to construct counterexamples in which two subpopulations arise from a system that supports only a single mode of behavior, driven by non-equilibrium transient dynamics. Better understanding the role of noise in transient biological randomness may allow for the discovery of novel mechanisms of regulation that are not apparent in steady state behaviors.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.