Back

Comprehensive Transcriptome Quality Assessment Using CATS: Reference-free and Reference-based Approaches

Bodulic, K.; Vlahovicek, K.

2025-07-25 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.07.22.666112 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate assessment of transcriptome assembly quality is critical to ensure the reliability of subsequent transcriptomic analyses. We present CATS (Comprehensive Assessment of Transcript Sequences), a tool offering both reference-free (CATS-rf) and reference-based (CATS-rb) transcriptome quality evaluation pipelines. CATS-rf maps RNA-seq reads back to the assembled transcripts and computes four interpretable scoring components that capture common assembly errors. CATS-rb assesses transcriptome completeness via alignment to a reference genome, supporting both annotation-free and annotation-based scoring. We benchmarked CATS on 672 transcriptomes from simulated and public RNA-seq data. CATS-rf outperformed existing tools in both transcript-level accuracy assessment and demonstrated high sensitivity to diverse assembly error types. CATS-rb produced robust transcriptome completeness estimates even without external annotation, with its scoring metrics strongly reflecting assembly quality. These results highlight CATS as an accurate, interpretable, and broadly applicable framework for evaluating transcriptome assemblies.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #7) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.