Back

Harmonic Amplitude-Modulated Singular Value Decomposition for Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging of Gas Vesicles

Zhang, G.; Leroy, H.; Haidour, N.; Rivera, E.; Zucker, N.; Nouhoum, M.; Jimenez, A.; Deffieux, T.; Malounda, D.; Nayak, R.; Pezet, S.; Shapiro, M.; Pernot, M.; Tanter, M.

2025-07-24 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.07.21.665910 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ultrafast nonlinear ultrasound imaging of gas vesicles (GV) contrast agents promises high-sensitivity biomolecular visualization with applications such as targeted molecular imaging of tumor markers or real-time tracking of gene expression. However, separating GV-specific signal from tissue remains challenging and requires the implementation of complex transmit schemes. In this work we introduce harmonic amplitude-modulated singular value decomposition (HAM-SVD), which synergizes pulse inversion (PI) with amplitude-modulated singular value decomposition (AM-SVD) to isolate GV-specific second-harmonic signals. In HAM-SVD, single-cycle plane waves at 9.6 MHz and five tilted angles (at a pulse repetition frequency of 2500 Hz) are transmitted under four duty cycles with alternating polarity. Beamformed IQ data are reshaped along a "space x pressure" matrix and decomposed via SVD; tissue background is cancelled by discarding the first and lowest singular modes, yielding an image comprised solely of pressure-dependent second harmonic signals. HAM-SVD sequence enables wide-field, ultrafast imaging without complex transmit sequences. Validation via simulations, in vitro phantoms, and in vivo rat lower limb experiments demonstrates HAM-SVDs outperformance compared to PI and AM-SVD. HAM-SVD is shown to achieve a 19.16 {+/-} 1.63 dB signal-to-background ratio (SBR) in vivo, surpassing PI (14.19 {+/-} 1.41 dB) and AM-SVD (15.79 {+/-} 1.38 dB). HAM-SVD overcomes limitations of conventional nonlinear techniques (e.g., depth restrictions, tissue clutter) by combining PIs harmonic sensitivity with AM-SVDs adaptive clutter filtering of tissue signals. This approach enhances molecular imaging specificity for GVs and holds potential for ultrasound localization microscopy of slow-flowing agents.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
8
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
11
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
12
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
16
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
20
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%