Back

Tranexamic acid in reducing expected blood loss in moderate to low risk surgeries: systematic review, meta-analysis and cost effectiveness analysis

Jaiswal, N.; Ciminata, G.; Robinson, W.; Taylor-Rowan, M.; Morris, T.; Nevill, C.; Tahir, H.; Fisher, E.; Mulholland, R.; Lumsden, M.; Noel-Storr, A.; Davies, A.; J Cooper, N.; Quinn, T.; Sutton, A.; Wu, O.

2025-07-21 hematology
10.1101/2025.07.21.25331903
Show abstract

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is well-established as a safe intervention for reducing transfusion requirements in surgeries with high-risk for blood loss. However, its role in surgeries classified as low-risk for blood loss remains uncertain. Given the frequency of such procedures, even small clinical benefits could have substantial cumulative impact. We assessed the clinical and cost-effectiveness of TXA in surgeries with low expected blood loss A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for adults or children undergoing low-risk surgeries, comparing peri-operative TXA (any route or dose) with placebo or standard care informed the clinical effectiveness and a decision model adapted from NICE NG24, focusing on short-term hospital costs informed the cost-effectiveness analysis. We included 82 RCTs comprising 8506 participants. TXA significantly reduced blood loss (ratio of means 0{middle dot}73, 95% CI 0{middle dot}68,0{middle dot}79) and transfusion rates (odds ratio 0{middle dot}39, 95% CI 0{middle dot}25,0{middle dot}61). It also reduced hospital stay by 0{middle dot}4 days (MD = -0{middle dot}40 days, 95% CI = -0{middle dot}77, -0{middle dot}02) and improved pain scores at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Evidence for thrombotic events was limited and inconclusive. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed TXA was cost-saving ({pound}156 per patient) and had a 99% probability of being cost-effective at the {pound}20lJ000 per QALY threshold. Reduction in bleeding and improved recovery outcomes even in surgeries with low anticipated blood loss support broader use of TXA in surgical care and suggests revisiting existing guidelines to include surgeries with any bleeding risk. Further research should examine long-term safety and patient-reported outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Haematology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
13.5%
2
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
11.6%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 44%
11.5%
4
Blood
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
7.8%
5
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 28%
3.1%
7
Blood Advances
based on 16 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
9
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 60%
2.5%
11
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
based on 10 papers
Top 0.8%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
13
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
2.4%
14
Tropical Medicine & International Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
16
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 9%
1.6%
17
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 33%
1.4%
19
Transfusion
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Systematic Reviews
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 19%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 19%
0.7%