Tranexamic acid in reducing expected blood loss in moderate to low risk surgeries: systematic review, meta-analysis and cost effectiveness analysis
Jaiswal, N.; Ciminata, G.; Robinson, W.; Taylor-Rowan, M.; Morris, T.; Nevill, C.; Tahir, H.; Fisher, E.; Mulholland, R.; Lumsden, M.; Noel-Storr, A.; Davies, A.; J Cooper, N.; Quinn, T.; Sutton, A.; Wu, O.
Show abstract
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is well-established as a safe intervention for reducing transfusion requirements in surgeries with high-risk for blood loss. However, its role in surgeries classified as low-risk for blood loss remains uncertain. Given the frequency of such procedures, even small clinical benefits could have substantial cumulative impact. We assessed the clinical and cost-effectiveness of TXA in surgeries with low expected blood loss A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for adults or children undergoing low-risk surgeries, comparing peri-operative TXA (any route or dose) with placebo or standard care informed the clinical effectiveness and a decision model adapted from NICE NG24, focusing on short-term hospital costs informed the cost-effectiveness analysis. We included 82 RCTs comprising 8506 participants. TXA significantly reduced blood loss (ratio of means 0{middle dot}73, 95% CI 0{middle dot}68,0{middle dot}79) and transfusion rates (odds ratio 0{middle dot}39, 95% CI 0{middle dot}25,0{middle dot}61). It also reduced hospital stay by 0{middle dot}4 days (MD = -0{middle dot}40 days, 95% CI = -0{middle dot}77, -0{middle dot}02) and improved pain scores at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Evidence for thrombotic events was limited and inconclusive. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed TXA was cost-saving ({pound}156 per patient) and had a 99% probability of being cost-effective at the {pound}20lJ000 per QALY threshold. Reduction in bleeding and improved recovery outcomes even in surgeries with low anticipated blood loss support broader use of TXA in surgical care and suggests revisiting existing guidelines to include surgeries with any bleeding risk. Further research should examine long-term safety and patient-reported outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 94%
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 93%
- Study protocol for COvid-19 Vascular sERvice (COVER) study: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision, practice and outcomes of vascular surgery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Thromboembolic risk in lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy 89%
- Exploring the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in hematology: a systematic review of applications, benefits, and limitations 88%
- Validation of the IMPEDE VTE Score for Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Cohort Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning model predicts new-onset deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities after pelvic floor fracture surgery and targeted diagnosis 92%
- The long-term impact of vaginal surgical mesh devices in UK primary care: a cohort study in the CPRD 91%
- Sixty-day mortality among 520 Italian hospitalized COVID-19 patients according to the adopted ventilatory strategy in the context of an integrated multidisciplinary clinical organization: a population-based cohort study 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 90%
- Preclinical systematic review of CCR5 antagonists as cerebroprotective and stroke recovery enhancing agents 89%
- Double nerve transfer to a single target muscle: experimental model in the upper extremity 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.