Back

Cathepsins and Glaucoma: Genetic Evidence from a Mendelian Randomization Approach

Hua, Z.; Chen, X.; Yang, J.; Yu, X.

2025-07-21 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.07.20.25331784 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGlaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy primarily associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and characterized by optic nerve damage. Despite numerous risk factors, including high IOP, the molecular mechanisms underlying glaucoma remain unclear. The cathepsin family, a group of lysosomal proteases, plays a critical role in various physiological and pathological processes. This study investigates the causal relationship between cathepsins and glaucoma using Mendelian Randomization (MR). MethodsThis two-sample MR study evaluates the causal relationship between nine cathepsins and glaucoma subtypes using genetic data from the INTERVAL study and the FinnGen consortium. The primary MR analysis used the Inverse Variance Weighting (IVW) method, with supplementary analyses including MR-Egger and Weighted Median methods. Reverse MR and multivariate MR analyses were also performed. ResultsElevated levels of cathepsin F significantly decreased the risk of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) (OR = 0.815, p = 0.005). Reverse MR analyses indicated that primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) might reduce cathepsin F levels (OR = 0.949, p = 0.010). Multivariate MR analysis showed significant associations between specific cathepsins and glaucoma subtypes, including cathepsin F reducing the risk of PACG and cathepsin S reducing the risk of total glaucoma. ConclusionThis study provides evidence of a causal relationship between cathepsin levels and glaucoma subtypes, particularly highlighting the protective role of cathepsin F against PACG. These research findings offer insights into potential therapeutic targets for glaucoma, with the elucidation of their deeper mechanisms awaiting further investigation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.