Back

Floral display size does not affect the distribution of paternal diversity in Silene dioica

Joffard, N.; Lecat, I.; Ollier, K.; Jolivel, C.; Schmitt, E.; Gode, C.; Barbot, E.; Dufaÿ, M.; De Cauwer, I.

2025-07-23 plant biology
10.1101/2025.07.19.665651 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Premise of the studyPaternal diversity and its distribution within maternal plants is governed by various factors, including frequency of pollinator visits, patterns of pollinator movement and pollen carryover. Floral display size may have opposite effects on fruit and plant-level paternal diversity, because plants with large displays should receive more pollinator visits but also more sequential probes per visit. MethodsTo investigate the effect of floral display size on the distribution of paternal diversity in Silene dioica, we genotyped and assigned paternity for 1320 seeds sampled in several fruits per plant in control and manipulated females, whose flower number was artificially increased. We estimated within-fruit paternal diversity and sire profile dissimilarity among fruits and compared these metrics between control and manipulated plants. We then studied pollen carryover using controlled pollinator visits and pollen counts. Key resultsMost fruits were multiply sired, but we found no effect of flower supplementation on within-fruit paternal diversity. Sire profiles were more similar between fruits located on the same than on different females, but sire profile similarity was not higher within manipulated than within control plants. The pollen deposition curve was steep, with an increasing carryover fraction throughout the visitation sequence. ConclusionsOur results suggest that the effect of floral display size on pollinator foraging behaviour is too weak to affect paternal diversity and its distribution in S. dioica, or that other processes, such as limited pollen carryover and spatially restricted pollen dispersal, blur the effect of pollinator visit frequency and movements on sire profiles.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.0%
2
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Plant Reproduction
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
6
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
12
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
15
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%