XL-Ranker: A Computational Workflow for Prioritizing Protein-Protein Interactions from Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry Data
Chen, W.; Elizarraras, J. M.; Jiao, F.; Huang, L.; Zhang, B.
Show abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are central to virtually all biological processes, and their disruption can lead to a wide spectrum of human diseases. Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) enables proteome-scale detection of interacting peptide pairs, from which PPIs can be inferred. However, interpretating XL-MS data to assign homologous cross-linked peptide pairs to specific protein interactions can be challenging. A major hurdle arises when a single peptide can map to multiple proteins, and when two such peptides are paired, the number of possible protein-protein interactions increases combinatorially. This mapping ambiguity can lead to inflated interaction networks that could compromise downstream analysis and biological interpretation. However, this problem has often been overlooked or addressed using heuristic approaches in previous XL-MS studies. To tackle this challenge, we developed XL-Ranker, a computational framework that combines a set cover graph algorithm and machine learning to systematically resolve peptide-mapping ambiguity and infer high-confidence PPIs from XL-MS data. Applied to an XL-MS dataset from HEK293 cells, XL-Ranker identified a high-confidence network with 880 PPIs involving 964 unique genes. Among all possible PPIs, the ones selected by XL-Ranker for inclusion in the final network had significantly higher interaction scores in the STRING database than the excluded ones. Network analysis further demonstrated that these interactions form biologically meaningful clusters, supporting the accuracy of our approach. In summary, XL-Ranker provides a practical solution to a key analytical challenge in XL-MS data interpretation, enhancing the reliability of PPI discovery.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.