Back

Clinical Validation of RlapsRisk BC in an international multi-cohorts setting.

Gaury, V.; Vaquette, Z.; Aubert, V.; Barcenas, C.; Jones, L. J.; Jacobs, D.; Guillon, J.; Filiot, A.; van der Vegt, B.; Hocquet, E.; Maisin, C.; Spary, L. K.; Bateson, M.; Martin, A.- L.; Drubay, D.; Everhard, S.; Guillou, L.; Sefta, M.; Garberis, I.; Andre, F.; Salomon, A. V.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Lacroix-Triki, M.

2025-07-23 oncology
10.1101/2025.07.18.25331788
Show abstract

PurposeThis study evaluated the prognostic performance of RlapsRisk BC, a multimodal deep learning tool designed to predict distant recurrence-free interval (dRFI) in early-stage, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer using routine H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) and standard clinicopathologic features. MethodsRlapsRisk BC was developed and internally validated on seven retrospective cohorts totaling 6,039 patients. Its ability to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups for dRFI was then assessed in a blinded, retrospective validation across three independent international cohorts (UK, France, USA), including 591 patients with non-metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone. ResultsAcross all validation cohorts, RlapsRisk BC showed strong prognostic performance, stratifying patients into distinct low- and high-risk groups with hazard ratios from 3.93 to 9.05. At 5 years, distant recurrence ranged from 0.85%-4.7% in low-risk vs. 6.39%-34.8% in high-risk groups. This separation remained robust across subgroups, including grade 2 tumors, menopausal status, and nodal involvement. RlapsRisk BC was also an independent prognostic factor and improved performance when combined with clinical variables (age, tumor size, nodal status). It increased the c-index by 0.08, 0.19, and 0.20 across the three cohorts, with significant improvement in two. Compared to genomic assays, RlapsRisk BC showed complementary--and sometimes superior--performance, particularly for identifying low-risk patients. At matched specificity, it achieved higher sensitivity: 0.85 vs. 0.33 (Oncotype DX) and 0.74 vs. 0.49 (EndoPredict). ConclusionRlapsRisk BC demonstrates strong, independent prognostic value and may offer a scalable, accessible alternative to genomic assays. Further studies are needed to confirm clinical utility and support integration into treatment decisions. ContextO_ST_ABSKey ObjectiveC_ST_ABSThis study aimed to assess whether RlapsRisk BC, a digital pathology-based AI model, can provide clinically meaningful prognostic stratification in ER-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The AI model combines standard histology exhibited in whole slide images of hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue sections and clinical data. The prognostic performance of RlapsRisk BC was evaluated across multiple independent patient cohorts. Knowledge GeneratedThe study demonstrates that RlapsRisk BC offers independent prognostic value beyond established clinical variables and genomic assays. It consistently stratifies patients into high- and low-risk groups for distant recurrence, with reproducible performance across diverse and independent cohorts, supporting its potential integration into routine clinical decision-making. RelevanceRlapsRisk BC may serve as a scalable alternative or adjunct to molecular assays, supporting more personalized and accessible treatment decisions in breast cancer, particularly in settings where genomic testing is unavailable, limited, or yields intermediate-risk results.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 7%
11.0%
3
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 0.4%
7.4%
4
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
7.4%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 63%
6.2%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 0.7%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
5.2%
8
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 5%
4.4%
9
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
2.9%
10
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 56%
2.8%
12
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
2.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
14
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
15
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 1.0%
2.3%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
1.7%
17
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
19
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 13%
0.8%
20
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
21
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 54%
0.7%