Back

The effects of ploidy and mating system on the evolvability of populations: theoretical and empirical investigations

Olmedo-Castellanos, C.; Douet, D.; Ferron, C.; Garcia-Munoz, A.; Munoz-Pajares, A. J.; Abdelaziz, M.; Clo, J.

2025-07-21 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.07.17.665335 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The amount of genetic diversity is a key parameter to understand the adaptive potential of populations. It has been demonstrated both theoretically and empirically that several factors influence genetic variance. In angiosperms, two of those are the ploidy level and the mating system of the populations. Polyploidy is theoretically known to increase adaptive potential in the long term. Self-fertilization has been theoretically associated with a decrease in genetic variance, even if it lacks empirical support. These factors have been studied independently, but are often shared in plants. However, there is a lack of empirical studies about the joint effects of polyploidy and selfing on genetic variance. In this paper, we conducted theoretical simulations to explore how genetic diversity could be affected by the ploidy level and mating system. We compared the simulation results with empirical estimates of genetic variance from the plant species Erysimum incanum, a selfing species from the Western Mediterranean basin exhibiting three different ploidy levels. We measured a series of phenotypic traits in individuals of each ploidy, obtained by controlled crosses and grown in different climatic conditions. While theoretical approaches showed a positive relationship between ploidy and genetic variance in both the short and long term, empirical results show lower evolvability and transgressive segregation for polyploids, both results being dependent on environmental conditions. Genetic variance in E. incanum polyploids could be related to recent establishment and adaptation to harsh environments, which explains the apparent contradiction with theory, where more settled and established populations are considered.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
4
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
7
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
11
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
12
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
17
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
18
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%