The Impact of Reference Genome Divergence on Ancient DNA Damage Detection in Metagenomic Contexts
Guinet, B.; Sharif, B. M.; van der Valk, T.
Show abstract
The reliability of ancient DNA (aDNA) authentication depends on detecting characteristic damage patterns, particularly cytosine deamination at fragment ends. However, in ancient metagenomic studies, sequence divergence between aDNA reads and available reference genomes may obscure such damage signals. We systematically evaluated how reference genome divergence, read count, read length, and damage levels affect aDNA damage profiles using both empirical datasets and controlled simulations. Using ancient Yersinia pestis and Hepatitis B virus data, we show that mapping to divergent reference genomes significantly reduces the detectability and intensity of characteristic damage patterns, particularly at low read counts. Simulations further revealed that reference genome identity is the strongest predictor of damage intensity, while read count primarily influences damage stochasticity. We introduce a correction matrix that adjusts C-to-T damage profiles for reference divergence, improving damage signal recovery. Our findings highlight methodological considerations for authenticating aDNA in metagenomic contexts, particularly when closely related reference genomes are unavailable.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing full variation profile analysis with the conventional consensus method in SARS-CoV-2 phylogeny 94%
- Choice of assemblers has a critical impact on de novo assembly of SARS-CoV-2 genome and characterizing variants 93%
- SatXplor - A comprehensive pipeline for satellite DNA analyses in complex genome assemblies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prior knowledge on context-driven DNA fragmentation probabilities can improve de novo genome assembly algorithms 95%
- VirPool: Model-Based Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Proportions in Wastewater Samples 94%
- Read-SpaM: assembly-free and alignment-free comparison of bacterial genomes with low sequencing coverage 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.